Naivety of Darwinism! part II
The Darwinian argument is based on the teleological link namely the mechanical finality identified as scientific and not on a causal connection.
Darwinism is short of providing answers to the following queries of how come that:
A. Each species is distinct from another species.
B. There is no evidence of a starting point in the evolution process.
C. There is no evidence of its origin.
D. There is no evidence of any relation among the species.
E. There is no evidence of an evolutionary process on any level in the actual presence of all species.
F. There is no proof of any link within a presumed evolution within one species.
G. There is no evidence for any evolutionary-link relation among different species.
H. The present existing species do not evolute any more?
Đ. The cross-evolution does not continue, even in a fractional manner, and why should it keep to its precise actual present form?
Finally it does not explain why is life? where life phenomenon came from? Its origin? what makes it tick in its multiple and distinct forms? Why should there be live and what explains death and why a life-cycle for every species. Life phenomenon needs pre planned conditions to exist: how come these conditions are prefournished and who supplies them. Man comes into a world already planned and he has not one say in it and not even one single actions or endeavour. Above all Who controls the Show?
A chimpanzee evaluating into a biped, a Neanderthal and then into Homo sapien sapien is a product of the imagination of
Darwin. A Dinosaur who evolved into a pigeon, claimed by a seminar of scientists in Washington Seattle recently, cannot be taken seriously. An ant does not show any tendency to evolve into an elephant, and we do not know if a butterfly shows desire to become a hippopotamus. We conclude, that in view of no proof, evidence or even an index, the Darwinist Theory of Evolution does not explain the reality of the presence, origin, function of living species. Whatever this Theory assumes is, in our view, a conjectural hypothetical explanation of the reality of living species. Each species, among the two million species, has its unique characteristics which we identify it with it. Although every living phenomenon is made up largely of water, minerals and metals, they do not necessarily emerge out of water nor do they need to evolve from one another.
The Darwinist Theory is no more than a belief system that is void of empirical foundation and lack greatly in real satisfactory explanations.
If lamarque nor Darwin, nor their idiot fellow scientists, particularly the mind crippled Hawking, do not control the world nor have one single contribution to it, then who DOES!!!
The Darwinian argument is based on the teleological link namely the mechanical finality identified as scientific and not on a causal connection.
Darwinism is short of providing answers to the following queries of how come that:
A. Each species is distinct from another species.
B. There is no evidence of a starting point in the evolution process.
C. There is no evidence of its origin.
D. There is no evidence of any relation among the species.
E. There is no evidence of an evolutionary process on any level in the actual presence of all species.
F. There is no proof of any link within a presumed evolution within one species.
G. There is no evidence for any evolutionary-link relation among different species.
H. The present existing species do not evolute any more?
Đ. The cross-evolution does not continue, even in a fractional manner, and why should it keep to its precise actual present form?
Finally it does not explain why is life? where life phenomenon came from? Its origin? what makes it tick in its multiple and distinct forms? Why should there be live and what explains death and why a life-cycle for every species. Life phenomenon needs pre planned conditions to exist: how come these conditions are prefournished and who supplies them. Man comes into a world already planned and he has not one say in it and not even one single actions or endeavour. Above all Who controls the Show?
A chimpanzee evaluating into a biped, a Neanderthal and then into Homo sapien sapien is a product of the imagination of
Darwin. A Dinosaur who evolved into a pigeon, claimed by a seminar of scientists in Washington Seattle recently, cannot be taken seriously. An ant does not show any tendency to evolve into an elephant, and we do not know if a butterfly shows desire to become a hippopotamus. We conclude, that in view of no proof, evidence or even an index, the Darwinist Theory of Evolution does not explain the reality of the presence, origin, function of living species. Whatever this Theory assumes is, in our view, a conjectural hypothetical explanation of the reality of living species. Each species, among the two million species, has its unique characteristics which we identify it with it. Although every living phenomenon is made up largely of water, minerals and metals, they do not necessarily emerge out of water nor do they need to evolve from one another.
The Darwinist Theory is no more than a belief system that is void of empirical foundation and lack greatly in real satisfactory explanations.
If lamarque nor Darwin, nor their idiot fellow scientists, particularly the mind crippled Hawking, do not control the world nor have one single contribution to it, then who DOES!!!
