Native Indian Genocide: Parallels in Palestine

khothla

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
120
Native Indian Genocide: Parallels in Palestine

By Yuram Abdullah Weiler​


March 3, 2010


"One of the greatest crimes against humanity occurred right here in the United States of America. Support for the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People is a start to right this great wrong," declared the American Indian Movement in a press release on 24 September 2009.

Perhaps my natural sense of outrage and revulsion at the injustices and atrocities inflicted upon indigenous peoples by the U.S., Zionists and other colonizing powers is inherited from my mother. Before she died, she told me that ancestors on her father’s side of the family traced their roots back to the Iroquois nation.

The United States of America, of course, voted against the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Only a country that denies the rights of its own Native Indians could object to the right of self-determination for other indigenous peoples.

Likewise, only a country that had itself executed genocide on its own native peoples on a massive scale could be such an ardent supporter of the Zionist regime, which is currently engaged in a native Palestinian genocide.

How massive was the Native Indian genocide committed by the Euroamerican colonizers? According to the late Professor Howard Zinn, of the 10 million Native Indians who lived north of present-day Mexico when Columbus arrived, less than a million remain. Other scholars put the indigenous population in 1492 as high as 18 million. Based on a nadir population of 250,000 around 1900, the American Indian holocaust perpetrated by Euroamerican colonizers claimed at least 9 million lives.

"That there was tragedy, deception, barbarity, and virtually every other vice known to man in the 300-year history of the expansion of the original 13 Colonies into a Nation which now embraces more than three million square miles and 50 States cannot be denied," grudgingly conceded a U.S. Senate committee on Indian Affairs.

How did the U.S. colonizers usurp Native Indian lands? The pattern was already in place by 1713 with the Treaty of Utrecht, which established a "buffer" zone of Native Indian land between French and British colonial powers. Caught between the two, Native Indians defended their homes, families and lands with understandable ferocity against an invasion by Euroamerican colonizers who ignored the treaty and settled in the buffer zone. Characterizing Native Indian resistance as unprovoked attacks on peaceful settlers, the invaders demanded U.S. Army protection from the "uncivilized savages."

Forced eviction, relocation and starvation were among the atrocities committed by the U.S. government to carry out its genocide. Native Indians were removed at gunpoint from their homes and forced to resettle on reservations whose total area was only a small fraction of their ancestral lands. Some Indian nations were deliberately divided, such as the Cheyenne and the Seminole, separating relatives and extended families from one another by great distances. The viscously cruel tactic of destroying food crops and slaughtering buffalo led to the starvation and near extinction of many American Indian nations.

And if forced eviction, relocation and starvation proved insufficient to break the Native Indian will to resist, then the U.S. Cavalry supplemented by settler militias were called in with Howitzers to execute a massacre. One such bloodbath occurred in November of 1864, when 700 militiamen, many of them drunk, surrounded and attacked a peaceful Cheyenne and Arapaho village at Sand Creek, Colorado. At the end of the one-sided battle, 200 Native Indians had been killed and mutilated, over half women and children.

Looking at the methods employed by the Zionist colonizers against Palestinians, one immediately sees parallels to those used by the U.S. government to exterminate Native Indian peoples. The same methods of massacres, forced eviction, relocation and starvation used to colonize native lands in the U.S. have been employed in Palestine.

In March of 1948, Zionist forces launched a systematic plan to ethnically cleanse Palestine of its indigenous population. Heavily armed Zionist militias seized control of numerous multiethnic cities such as Jaffa, Haifa Safat and Tiberias, and ruthlessly drove out native Palestinian inhabitants. Massacres took place in Deir Yasin, where 100 men women and children were killed, Tantura, where 200 men were murdered and in 368 other Palestinian villages and cities. By the winter of 1948, 90 percent of the native population--some 750,000 Palestinians--had been turned into refugees.

Ethnic cleansing continued and by 1952, Palestinians had been forcibly evicted from another 40 villages. Settlements were built on top of the rubble of the 370 villages destroyed in 1948 to obliterate all evidence of the former Palestinian residents. Not satisfied with the Palestinian territory it occupied, "Israel" attacked Egypt and Jordan in 1967, seizing Jerusalem, the Golan Heights, the West Bank and Gaza, creating another 275,000 Palestinian refugees.

Currently, "Israel" is tightening its grip on the Occupied West Bank aided by U.S. and E.U.-trained security forces, and is starving out Gazans, denying them desperately-needed food and medical supplies, with its ongoing blockade helped by Egypt’s new steel wall. Like the American Indians of the 18th century caught between French and British colonizers, Gazans today find themselves caught between the U.S.-supported Israeli-Zionist regime and the U.S.-controlled Egyptian dictatorship, while Palestinians in the West Bank are squeezed between U.S. "ally" Jordan and the apartheid wall.

Great Lakota Nation leader Russell Means, speaking to American Indian students in 1995, reminded them, "At Wounded Knee in 1973, we were surrounded by the armed might of the United States of America, the most militarily powerful country in the world, but we were free." Similarly, Palestinians in Gaza and the Occupied West Bank may be surrounded by the armed might of the U.S.-financed Zionists, but they too will be free.

"The white man knows that he is alien and he knows that North America is Indian," observes Native American scholar Vine Deloria, Jr. Similarly, the Eurozionist colonizer knows that he is alien and that "Israel" is Palestinian.

Someday, Palestine will be free of Eurozionist colonizers, the Americas will be free of Euroamerican colonizers and indigenous people everywhere will be free to exercise their right of self-determination.

Someday, the United States, Britain, Israel, France and all who are complicit in colonizing lands belonging to Native American Indians, Palestinians and other indigenous peoples around the world will be held accountable for their crimes.

- Yuram Abdullah Weiler is a freelance writer and political critic who has written many articles on the Middle East and U.S. policy. Yuram resides in Denver, Colorado USA with his wife..


:: Article nr. 63854 sent on 04-mar-2010 02:28 ECT

www.uruknet.info?p=63854

Link: www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=15776
 
Werbung:
Although the number of native american deaths you are citing here may be accurate, you need to acknowledge that this was not a direct genocide. Yes, there were great injustices done. Indian lands were seized, and they were treated as worse than slaves in some cases. But you should keep things in perspective. Most of the deaths were from disease that was inadvertently transmitted to the natives from the Europeans, not from murder.

But this is all in the distant past. What is more interesting in the present is the Israel-Palestine topic. You clearly think that Israel is the evil party in this affair. So I am curious. Let's pretend that you are in charge of Israel and you have the ability to take any actions to make things right. What actions would you take? Would you unilaterally withdraw from Palestinian territory? If you did, then how would you respond when the Palestinians moved back in and started firing rockets from close range into Tel Aviv?
 
Although the number of native american deaths you are citing here may be accurate, you need to acknowledge that this was not a direct genocide. Yes, there were great injustices done. Indian lands were seized, and they were treated as worse than slaves in some cases. But you should keep things in perspective. Most of the deaths were from disease that was inadvertently transmitted to the natives from the Europeans, not from murder.
You've been reading too many American History books....typically abridged.

:rolleyes:

The Sand Creek Massacre!!!!

Wounded Knee

*

geronimo-illegal-aliens.jpg


June 16, 1829 - February 17, 1909

*​

"If this country is ever to be the kind of country we wanted to serve, it has to change. The change has to come from the beginning, from the very foundations of our society. The real war goes on still - Angola, Grenada, Cambodia, Nicaragua, Panama, Iraq - are all combat fronts which opened after the fall of Saigon. But the oldest war in our history is the Indian War, the war over the land. Our own war looked something like this war. The "wild West" was a free-fire zone. General Custer was on a search-and-destroy mission at Little Big Horn. Not much to choose between Wounded Knee and My Lai, or between forced relocation to new reservations and the resettlement camps we built in Vietnam.

One lesson we learned is also the same. The only basis for a just and lasting peace is freedom - the recognition of the right of all peoples to self determination.

500 years is long enough: it's time to make an end to this, the oldest war in our land."
 
Intermarriage and disease more than any two forces have shaped the fate of Native Americans. See: NA Intermarriage Those who tried to stay culturally pure are the minority--a choice not forced on them, but one chosen. It's their right.

Point of fact, millions of Americans, just like my Germanic looking wife and kids, are direct descendants of Natives (got a little Buck Woman in the woodpile) but are so far removed from that bloodline that they are no longer counted as mixed race, just European. It's BS--they're still descendants--just happily assimilated descendants who don't count, which skews the statistics.
 
...And now for the truth...can you accept it or are you too dense???

UCLA professor Jared Diamond, author of the universally acclaimed bestseller "Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies," writes:

"Throughout the Americas, diseases introduced with Europeans spread from tribe to tribe far in advance of the Europeans themselves, killing an estimated 95 percent of the pre-Columbian Native American population. The most populous and highly organized native societies of North America, the Mississippian chiefdoms, disappeared in that way between 1492 and the late 1600's, even before Europeans themselves made their first settlement on the Mississippi River (page 78)....

"The main killers were Old World germs to which Indians had never been exposed, and against which they therefore had neither immune nor genetic resistance. Smallpox, measles, influenza, and typhus rank top among the killers." (page 212).

"As for the most advanced native societies of North America, those of the U.S. Southeast and the Mississippi River system, their destruction was accomplished largely by germs alone, introduced by early European explorers and advancing ahead of them" (page 374)

Obviously, the decimation of native population by European germs represents an enormous tragedy, but in no sense does it represent a crime. Stories of deliberate infection by passing along "small-pox blankets" are based exclusively on two letters from British soldiers in 1763, at the end of the bitter and bloody French and Indian War. By that time, Indian populations (including those in the area) had already been terribly impacted by smallpox, and there's no evidence of a particularly devastating outbreak as a result of British policy.
http://townhall.com/columnists/Mich...ie_of_white_genocide_against_native_americans

And hey...I thought the Israelis lived in Palestine well before the invention of Islam. So, logic would dictate that they are the native Palestinians?
 
Although the number of native american deaths you are citing here may be accurate, you need to acknowledge that this was not a direct genocide. Yes, there were great injustices done. Indian lands were seized, and they were treated as worse than slaves in some cases. But you should keep things in perspective. Most of the deaths were from disease that was inadvertently transmitted to the natives from the Europeans, not from murder.

But this is all in the distant past. What is more interesting in the present is the Israel-Palestine topic. You clearly think that Israel is the evil party in this affair. So I am curious. Let's pretend that you are in charge of Israel and you have the ability to take any actions to make things right. What actions would you take? Would you unilaterally withdraw from Palestinian territory? If you did, then how would you respond when the Palestinians moved back in and started firing rockets from close range into Tel Aviv?

There's been much in Native circles about Anglos intentionally infecting Indians with smallpox-laden blankets. These acts are often considered the worst example of genocide against Indians.

Since these acts have become huge symbolically, it's important to understand what actually happened. The following is a good posting on the subject. As far as I know, it's accurate:


Plains Indian Smallpox Genocide
 
There's been much in Native circles about Anglos intentionally infecting Indians with smallpox-laden blankets. These acts are often considered the worst example of genocide against Indians.

Since these acts have become huge symbolically, it's important to understand what actually happened. The following is a good posting on the subject. As far as I know, it's accurate:


Plains Indian Smallpox Genocide


But you see, facts mean nothing to liberals and haters of America. They want to believe lies because they fit their kooky mindset. Trying to present facts which refute their beliefs, is futile.

What must it be like to live a lie?
 
Although the treatment of native Americans was barbaric, one must acknowledge the fact the native Americans themselves were prone to territorial disputes that led to the massacre and murder of men, women, children, and infants also. Just two of the well know disputes were the massacre of the Masticot Indians by Chippewas near the town of Custer Michigan, and the massacres of the Crow Indians by the Lakota's over the possession of the Northern Plains. It is romantic to view the Indians as peaceful victims, but the truth is that there were continuous wars between the various tribes. That is why the men were called: "Warriors."
 
It is romantic to view the Indians as peaceful victims, but the truth is that there were continuous wars between the various tribes. That is why the men were called: "Warriors."
...No doubt the "impetus" (Nationwide), for CHICKENHAWKS making continual-efforts to prove their well-"hidden" Manhood to everyone...with other peoples' children.

*

werent-soldiers.jpg


*

pinkhawks.jpg


"That's right.....we bad!!"
 
What does this have to do with today?

Many societies have experienced violent takeover's ... look at the

  • Trojan's at Sparta
  • Hannibal swept southern Europe
  • Conquistador's swept part's of the New World
  • Erie tribe destroyed because of Iroquois Nations
There are countless others ... not to mention Civil War's like in Somalia today with the Barre Regime.

Why kick up the dirt from yesterday when today's is ruining now?

... is this because of the Obama campaign promise to make right the broken treaties?
 
What does this have to do with today?

Why kick up the dirt from yesterday when today's is ruining now?

Because libs promote the denigration of our culture in the hope that Americans will not defend it. That has been their plan for decades. This is liberalism 101. And this is why many Americans hate their country. They have bought the lies.

If libs can get a majority of Americans to refuse to defend their culture, they can then proceed to destroy it and remake into a socialist/Marxist/Fascist/Communist....sh*thole.
 
Because libs promote the denigration of our culture in the hope that Americans will not defend it. That has been their plan for decades. This is liberalism 101. And this is why many Americans hate their country. They have bought the lies.

If libs can get a majority of Americans to refuse to defend their culture, they can then proceed to destroy it and remake into a socialist/Marxist/Fascist/Communist....sh*thole.

I can understand that ... look at how they do that to anything traditional.

...and they think they are "PROGRESSIVE" - more like Digressive to me.

Anything people have faith in - they rip apart - as they tear apart faith - they replace it with the acceptance of degenerate behavior insisting that is the correct version of normal.
 
Werbung:
Anything people have faith in - they rip apart - as they tear apart faith - they replace it with the acceptance of degenerate behavior insisting that is the correct version of normal.

Yes and it is intentional. The elitist liberals want to destroy everything about America.

Their followers, including some libs here at the HOP, are not so radical but are mostly just useful idiots. They are incapable of understanding reality and have been brainwashed into the liberal mind set.

Sadly, they will go along with anything the liberal elites tell them. They are incapable of thinking for themselves and do not understand the consequences of liberalism.
 
Back
Top