New York Times reader kills dozens in Norway

Little-Acorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
2,444
Location
San Diego, CA
Coulter has an uncannily incisive way of getting to the heart of a leftist institution's failures and hypocrisy. And the humor with which she writes is priceless.

---------------------------------------

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45145

New York Times Reader Kills Dozens in Norway

by Ann Coulter
07/27/2011

The New York Times wasted no time in jumping to conclusions about Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian who staged two deadly attacks in Oslo last weekend, claiming in the first two paragraphs of one story that he was a "gun-loving," "right-wing," "fundamentalist Christian," opposed to "multiculturalism."

It may as well have thrown in "Fox News-watching" and "global warming skeptic."

This was a big departure from the Times' conclusion-resisting coverage of the Fort Hood shooting suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan . Despite reports that Hasan shouted "Allahu Akbar!" as he gunned down his fellow soldiers at a military medical facility in 2009, only one of seven Times articles on Hasan so much as mentioned that he was a Muslim.

Of course, that story ran one year after Hasan's arrest, so by then, I suppose, the cat was out of the bag.

In fact, however, Americans who jumped to conclusions about Hasan were right and New York Times reporters who jumped to conclusions about Breivik were wrong.

True, in one lone entry on Breivik's gaseous 1,500-page manifesto, "2083: A European Declaration of Independence," he calls himself "Christian." But unfortunately he also uses a great number of other words to describe himself, and these other words make clear that he does not mean "Christian" as most Americans understand the term. (Incidentally, he also cites The New York Times more than a half-dozen times.)

Had anyone at the Times actually read Breivik's manifesto, they would have seen that he uses the word "Christian" as a handy moniker to mean "European, non-Islamic" -- not a religious Christian or even a vague monotheist. In fact, at several points in his manifesto, Breivik stresses that he has a beef with Christians for their soft-heartedness. (I suppose that's why the Times is never worried about a "Christian backlash.")


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
 
Werbung:
Coulter has an uncannily incisive way of getting to the heart of a leftist institution's failures and hypocrisy. And the humor with which she writes is priceless.

---------------------------------------

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45145

New York Times Reader Kills Dozens in Norway

by Ann Coulter
07/27/2011

The New York Times wasted no time in jumping to conclusions about Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian who staged two deadly attacks in Oslo last weekend, claiming in the first two paragraphs of one story that he was a "gun-loving," "right-wing," "fundamentalist Christian," opposed to "multiculturalism."

It may as well have thrown in "Fox News-watching" and "global warming skeptic."

This was a big departure from the Times' conclusion-resisting coverage of the Fort Hood shooting suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan . Despite reports that Hasan shouted "Allahu Akbar!" as he gunned down his fellow soldiers at a military medical facility in 2009, only one of seven Times articles on Hasan so much as mentioned that he was a Muslim.

Of course, that story ran one year after Hasan's arrest, so by then, I suppose, the cat was out of the bag.

In fact, however, Americans who jumped to conclusions about Hasan were right and New York Times reporters who jumped to conclusions about Breivik were wrong.

True, in one lone entry on Breivik's gaseous 1,500-page manifesto, "2083: A European Declaration of Independence," he calls himself "Christian." But unfortunately he also uses a great number of other words to describe himself, and these other words make clear that he does not mean "Christian" as most Americans understand the term. (Incidentally, he also cites The New York Times more than a half-dozen times.)

Had anyone at the Times actually read Breivik's manifesto, they would have seen that he uses the word "Christian" as a handy moniker to mean "European, non-Islamic" -- not a religious Christian or even a vague monotheist. In fact, at several points in his manifesto, Breivik stresses that he has a beef with Christians for their soft-heartedness. (I suppose that's why the Times is never worried about a "Christian backlash.")


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)


Talk about spin!!!!

How ridiculous can anyone become! How far will the Right reach to get even more out of touch with reality!

The fact is that that guy is a right extremist. AND he is a Christian.

That's IT!

Coulter has a big mouth, she is vicious, but she is also very stupid, and has demonstrated that very recently when she insister that "the US bombed Egypt!"

Oh well. . .I hope you keep on believing this trash. . .it just makes it even less likely that reasonable people will vote Republican!
 
And he is representative of neither group.


By the way, you may want to watch today's Daily show with Jon Stewart!

One more time, he got it just right. . .

You can find it by just plugging in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, July 27, 2011 in your search engine!
 
And he is representative of neither group.

Nore are most Muslims but they don't get that respect from Fox Noise and the rest...they get to have there Religion attacked, there Mosques apposed...and watch Republican Presidential Candidates tell them they are at best 2nd class citizens...

so the Right wing media can take the fact that Yes there are Christian Extremist..and yes it will be talked about...or they can shut up when blaming Islam for all the attacks that don't represent Islam.
 
1400054192.jpg
 
Coulter has an uncannily incisive way of getting to the heart of a leftist institution's failures and hypocrisy. And the humor with which she writes is priceless.

---------------------------------------

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=45145

New York Times Reader Kills Dozens in Norway

by Ann Coulter
07/27/2011

The New York Times wasted no time in jumping to conclusions about Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian who staged two deadly attacks in Oslo last weekend, claiming in the first two paragraphs of one story that he was a "gun-loving," "right-wing," "fundamentalist Christian," opposed to "multiculturalism."

It may as well have thrown in "Fox News-watching" and "global warming skeptic."

This was a big departure from the Times' conclusion-resisting coverage of the Fort Hood shooting suspect, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan . Despite reports that Hasan shouted "Allahu Akbar!" as he gunned down his fellow soldiers at a military medical facility in 2009, only one of seven Times articles on Hasan so much as mentioned that he was a Muslim.

Of course, that story ran one year after Hasan's arrest, so by then, I suppose, the cat was out of the bag.

In fact, however, Americans who jumped to conclusions about Hasan were right and New York Times reporters who jumped to conclusions about Breivik were wrong.

True, in one lone entry on Breivik's gaseous 1,500-page manifesto, "2083: A European Declaration of Independence," he calls himself "Christian." But unfortunately he also uses a great number of other words to describe himself, and these other words make clear that he does not mean "Christian" as most Americans understand the term. (Incidentally, he also cites The New York Times more than a half-dozen times.)

Had anyone at the Times actually read Breivik's manifesto, they would have seen that he uses the word "Christian" as a handy moniker to mean "European, non-Islamic" -- not a religious Christian or even a vague monotheist. In fact, at several points in his manifesto, Breivik stresses that he has a beef with Christians for their soft-heartedness. (I suppose that's why the Times is never worried about a "Christian backlash.")


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)

Yes, Coulter is fantastic.

She is one of a handful of conservatives who is very effective at exposing the idiocy that is the Left. And, her humorous approach is really great.
 
Werbung:
Back
Top