Place iraq in the context of other wars, and it is going very well.
Time and patience. Two things that liberals are severely lacking. If it doesn't give you instant gratification, you aren't interested.
Pure captialism. Those people were consumers who were not connected. Hardly a liberal program.
The interstate was a department of defense program. Not liberal in any way. The interstates were designed to the specifications necessary to move heavy military equipment and munitions across distances and high speeds.
Who did this lift out of poverty?
Who did this lift out of poverty? I am embarrassed foryou coyote. Out of the thousands and thousands of programs invented and funded by liberals, you only come up with 4 and two of those don't qualify and the other two didn't meet the requirements of the question?
Don't always? Try never. And in the end, a stable iraq governing itself will benefit the whole region. It is far to early to pass judgement on the end results of iraq.
If a thing works, exactly why does it need to change?
And look at the social ills we are dealing with as a result of headlong change. We have plenty of consequences but no solutions. Only headlong rush into more change. Liberals keep doing the same thing getting the same results but somehow expect different results next time. You know what they say about such a mindset don't you?
Exactly what is the merit to rushing to change headlong without first considering the consequences? What is the merit to a "to hell with the consequences, we'll deal with that later" mind set?
