NY Times kicks conservative political books off its NYT Bestseller List

Little-Acorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
2,444
Location
San Diego, CA
Looks like the New York Times - with its readership dwindling year after year - decided to kick out those pesky political books off its famous NYT Bestsellers List. There is no truth to the rumor that this was because the only political books that could make the bestsellers list, were conservative ones - seems that no one wants to buy the liberal books. Nope, that had nothing to do with it. The Times is kicking ALL political books off, not just the conservative ones, can't you see?

Sort of the way that, back in the 1800s, the North-dominated Congress kept passing huge taxes on items like sorghum, rice, and cotton, some up to 50% of sale value. In obediance to the Constitution, these taxes were applied equally across the country, north AND south. The fact that the vast bulk of those crops were grown in the South, had nothing to do with it, nope, nothing at all.

This was one of the main causes of the Civil War, second to slavery. If there had been no slavery, this might have been enough by itself to trigger secession and the resulting war... but now we'll never know.

Now the New York Times, in its lofty ignorance, seems destined to repeat history.

----------------------------------

http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/ny-t...cized-conservatives-need-not-apply/#more-2710

NY TIMES DISSES FOX NEWS AUTHORS - BEST SELLERS LIST IS NOW POLITICIZED: CONSERVATIVES NEED NOT APPLY

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
March 16, 2011

It's been widely reported that Bill Keller, the Executive Editor of The New York Times, doesn't like Fox News - and has utter contempt for its conservative audience. He makes no bones about it. According to Keller, those who watch FoxNews are "among the most cynical people on planet Earth."

Now it turns out that he doesn't like books written by FoxNews contributors. So on Sunday -for the first time since the New York Times Bestsellers List first appeared in 1942, best selling political books will not appear in the Hardcover Non-Fiction List. Instead, those books will be relegated to the Advice, How-To and Miscellaneous List, along with The 4 Hour Body and Weight Watchers New Cookbook.

That is if the author is a FoxNews contributor.

Talk about giving cynicism a new meaning!

On Sunday, the following books will appear on the Advice list:

2. Simple Government, Mike Huckabee

3. Revolt!, Dick Morris & Eileen McGann

6. Win, Frank Luntz

What do those authors have in common? Just one thing: Huckabee, Morris, &Luntz are all FoxNews contributors. (McGann is just a cynical FoxNews watcher!)

Last week, the Wall Street Journal listed Simple Government as #3 and Revolt! As #5 bestselling non-fiction books in the country (including Advice books!). That was based on Nielsen point-of-sale data. But, that was too much for The Times - two FoxNews contributors in the top 10 of all non-fiction books sold. So, The Times decided to cook the list.

By the way, the Advice List was started in 1984 because too many how-to books were showing up on the Hardcover Non-Fiction Best Sellers List.

Apparently, too many Fox News Contributors are crowding up the hardcover best seller list, so they've been thrown downstairs.

The ghettoization of the Foxnews books inside the How To list has an important impact on sales. It means that many stores won't put Revolt!, Simple Government, and Win up front with the best sellers but will assign them shelf space back with cookbooks, marital advice, and diet books. We hope you ferret them out anyway and show the Times the limits of its power.

The New York Times is once again showing its liberal bias in overtly politicizing the best sellers list. Conservatives and FoxNews commentators need not apply. Now, it's not just the news that's way over left, it's the best sellers, too.

And the motto of The Times is "All the News That's Fit To Print." Talk about cynical.


(Full text of the article can be read at the above URL)
 
Werbung:
Similar crap going on for a long time in the New York Slimes - like refusing to review conservative books when they made the best seller's list - even when they are number 1. Regarding books, it should be noted that the book publishing industry is part of the lib media writ large - most conservative books get published by Regnery, a small publishing house. The lib media in the US functions in many regards like that of their ideological cousins in the old soviet union - there is nothing more threatening to them than a free markeplace of ideas - they know that their ideas wouldn't survive that.

As for the New York Slimes - it's almost sad for THEM. A once respectable forum for the liberal viewpoint declines into leftwing irrelevency as its circulation numbers head toward zero - they're going out not with a bang but a whimper.
 
Similar crap going on for a long time in the New York Slimes - like refusing to review conservative books when they made the best seller's list - even when they are number 1. Regarding books, it should be noted that the book publishing industry is part of the lib media writ large - most conservative books get published by Regnery, a small publishing house. The lib media in the US functions in many regards like that of their ideological cousins in the old soviet union - there is nothing more threatening to them than a free markeplace of ideas - they know that their ideas wouldn't survive that.

As for the New York Slimes - it's almost sad for THEM. A once respectable forum for the liberal viewpoint declines into leftwing irrelevency as its circulation numbers head toward zero - they're going out not with a bang but a whimper.

Yeah, but elitist liberals and progressives generally speaking, think anyone holding opposing political views is to be ostracized and is a complete dunce. They don't know anyone who is not like them. And, I doubt they would ever associate with people holding opposing views. This is why they have no problem with efforts to silence opposing views. Its just the right thing to do, in their mind. Never mind what the Constitution says.

Remember this?

Alleged Nixon quote
Kael is frequently quoted as having said, in the wake of Richard Nixon's landslide victory in the 1972 presidential election, that she "couldn't believe Nixon had won", since no one she knew had voted for him. The quote is sometimes cited by conservatives (such as Bernard Goldberg, in his book Bias), as an example of the alleged cluelessness and insularity of the liberal elite. There are variations as to the exact wording, the speaker (it has variously been attributed to other liberal female writers, including Katharine Graham, Susan Sontag, and Joan Didion),[43][44] and the timing (in addition to Nixon's victory, it has been claimed to have been uttered after Ronald Reagan's re-election in 1984.)[45]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauline_Kael#Alleged_Nixon_quote
 
Werbung:
Back
Top