Little-Acorn
Well-Known Member
Apparently a little while ago the Obama admin announced that health care providers would have to provide free contraceptives etc. for women who wanted them. This didn't go over well with some, particularly hospitals etc. run by Catholic churches, who have always disapproved of contraception, morning-after pills etc.
So today I heard Obama go on the air and announce that he had changed his mind: now insurance companies, not hospitals (at least Catholic ones) would be required to pay for the contraceptives.
I had to do a double-take.
Could somebody explain to me where the President gets the authority to simply command that a certain groups must pay for something, and Bingo, they have to do it?
---------------------------
I just caught a little bit of the announcement, and maybe I'm missing something here (wouldn't be the first time :-/ )
But suppose that, instead of announcing that insurance companies had to pay for them, what if he had anounced instead that Little-Acorn, that guy with the computer in San Diego, had to pay for them?
Would I have no alternative? I would have to pay for them?
What's the difference between Obama ordering insurance companies to pay, and Obama ordering private individual(s) to pay?
If Congress, in its legislative majesty, had written up, discussed, and passed a bill saying XXX company (or Little-Acorn) had to pay. They vote on it, pass it, and send it to the President, who signs it.
Isn't that called a Bill of Attainder? Which is flatly banned in the Constitution?
----------------------------
As far as I know, Congress can't do that. So how on Earth can one man (the President) do it? Just order some person or group to pay for something?
I can see where a King might have the power to do that, in countries that have Kings.
Do we have one?
So today I heard Obama go on the air and announce that he had changed his mind: now insurance companies, not hospitals (at least Catholic ones) would be required to pay for the contraceptives.
I had to do a double-take.
Could somebody explain to me where the President gets the authority to simply command that a certain groups must pay for something, and Bingo, they have to do it?
---------------------------
I just caught a little bit of the announcement, and maybe I'm missing something here (wouldn't be the first time :-/ )
But suppose that, instead of announcing that insurance companies had to pay for them, what if he had anounced instead that Little-Acorn, that guy with the computer in San Diego, had to pay for them?
Would I have no alternative? I would have to pay for them?
What's the difference between Obama ordering insurance companies to pay, and Obama ordering private individual(s) to pay?
If Congress, in its legislative majesty, had written up, discussed, and passed a bill saying XXX company (or Little-Acorn) had to pay. They vote on it, pass it, and send it to the President, who signs it.
Isn't that called a Bill of Attainder? Which is flatly banned in the Constitution?
----------------------------
As far as I know, Congress can't do that. So how on Earth can one man (the President) do it? Just order some person or group to pay for something?
I can see where a King might have the power to do that, in countries that have Kings.
Do we have one?