Obama plans to take over the U.S. Census Bureau

XCALIDEM

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
1,052
My fellow americans, this is the begining of our government trying to take over our lives.This is the same thing that HUgo Chavez is doing in Venezuela :mad:


Obama shifts Census oversight, triggering angry protest by RepublicansBy Carrie Dann CongressDaily February 6, 2009 President Obama has decided to bring the U.S. Census Bureau under White House jurisdiction, a move that incensed House Republicans, who fired off a blistering letter to him Thursday, calling it "outrageous and unprecedented" and a "blatant partisan and political maneuver."
The move would shift the chain of command with the bureau and the Commerce Department, where the bureau currently resides. It comes after the Congressional Black Caucus, National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials and other groups expressed displeasure with Obama's nominee for Commerce secretary, Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire.
Gregg, the groups said this week, opposed efforts to secure emergency funding for the 2000 Census, which they asserted exposes a potential lack of commitment to ensuring that hard-to-reach minority populations are properly accounted for in the 2010 census.
A White House spokesman confirmed Thursday that Obama plans to work closely with the bureau, which will remain within the Commerce Department.
"From the first days of the transition the census has been a priority for the president, and a process he wanted to re-evaluate," the spokesman said in a prepared statement.
"There is historic precedent for the director of the census, who works for the Commerce secretary and the president, to work closely with White House senior management -- given the number of decisions that will have to be put before the president," he said. "We plan to return to that model in this administration."

House Republicans reacted quickly. House Oversight and Government Reform ranking member Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Oversight and Government Reform Census Subcommittee ranking member Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., seized on speculation that the move would place the yet-unnamed Census Bureau director under the watchful eye of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, instead of leaving Gregg in charge.
They suggested the move could improperly influence legislative redistricting, which is shaped by Census counts.
"By circumventing the secretary of Commerce's oversight of the Census Bureau and handing it directly to a political operative such as Mr. Emanuel, you are severely jeopardizing the fairness and accuracy of the 2010 Census," Issa and McHenry wrote Obama.
Details of the day-to-day relationship between the White House and the Census Bureau seem hazy.
Aides speculated Thursday that the bureau's budget and public-affairs functions may be routed through OMB, an arrangement that would assuage the fears expressed by advocates concerned that the Census director's public statements and congressional testimony would be subject to censorship by less-than-supportive leadership at Commerce.
Sources on both sides of the issue said black lawmakers and others interested in securing more funding for the 2010 Census had been hoping for assurances of support from Obama as soon as they learned about Gregg's possible selection to Commerce post.
One Democratic aide close to the matter called the administration's decision a direct response to the grievances of minority groups upset with Gregg's appointment.
"People started yelling at them," said the aide, who added that the details of how the White House's interactions with the Census director remain woefully undefined.
"Their answer was 'OK, fine, [Gregg] won't be in charge,'" the aide said. "It wasn't a plan. It was a reaction."
The administration's idea to shift jurisdiction over the Census Bureau was not entirely new.
In September, congressional Democrats, led by Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., proposed legislation to make the bureau an independent federal agency. Such agencies report directly to the president, as the Federal Emergency Management Agency did before it became part of the Homeland Security Department.
A Census Bureau spokeswoman declined to comment on any organizational changes until a director is in place.
http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=41986&dcn=todaysnews
 
Werbung:
The more I read about this, it leadsme to believe that they want to use this data for ACORN purposes.
 
If you don't think this is serious, then read this:

The U.S. census -- a counting of the U.S. population -- is conducted every 10 years by the Commerce Department. Its results determine the decennial redrawing of congressional districts

As a matter of impact, the census has tremendous political significance. Political parties are always eager to have a hand in redrawing districts so that they can maximize their own party's clout while minimizing the opposition, often through gerrymandering.
The census also determines the composition of the Electoral College, which chooses the president. If one party were to control the census, it could arguably try to perpetuate its hold on political power.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/fir...unds-alarm-obama-decision-census-white-house/
 
Oh ya, it's coming...frickin' change! It's hear, can ya FEEEEEEL it.

Frickin' dems are evil but far left, power hungry dems are just pure satanic to the bone!

Now watch a liberal quote something from the Bush years to defend this empty suit BHO, whose policies smell of B.O.!

Yes, they always defend their asses by saying that they're changing Bush's policies and of course this controversial crap will go under the radar of the liberal media... :mad:
 
You doom and gloom wackos are quite amusing. For over seven years you just drooled out your unwavering support for George W. Bush. Disaster after disaster, blunder after blunder, you rushed to your keyboards to excuse away, rationalize or justify the growing volume of displays of incompetence from Bush.

Then you shifted gears. You predicted a great McCain victory because Barack Obama was a Muslim, a terrorist, the anti-Christ, a Socialist, a Communist, not even an American citizen, no claim was too absurd or false for you to babble about.

So here we are today. George W. Bush is now generally accepted as the worst president in our nation’s history. So much for your credibility on that subject. John McCain and the Republicans took a serious thumping in the election, just like they did in 2006. So much for your credibility on that topic.

Over the months that turned into years the kool-aid drinkers and moonbats have now proven they have zero credibility. Their claims are false. Their opinions are groundless, absent of reason and frequently just more lies. Their only accomplishments over the past eight years is to conclusively prove they’re half-wits about George W. Bush, get a most righteous thumping in the 2006 national election, and two years later lose ground in the Senate and Congress, and get creamed in the presidential election. Some list of accomplishments!

Yet here they are, barking at the moon again, only now it’s just before an audience of other tinfoil hat wearers down at their trailer park. No one else would consider the opinions of individuals that so willingly squandered their credibility over the years to have any worth at all. Poor losers, experienced losers, but still poor losers and boo-hoo babies spewing their doom and gloom predictions.

Quite funny, in a pathetic sense.
 
You doom and gloom wackos are quite amusing. For over seven years you just drooled out your unwavering support for George W. Bush. Disaster after disaster, blunder after blunder, you rushed to your keyboards to excuse away, rationalize or justify the growing volume of displays of incompetence from Bush.

Then you shifted gears. You predicted a great McCain victory because Barack Obama was a Muslim, a terrorist, the anti-Christ, a Socialist, a Communist, not even an American citizen, no claim was too absurd or false for you to babble about.

So here we are today. George W. Bush is now generally accepted as the worst president in our nation’s history. So much for your credibility on that subject. John McCain and the Republicans took a serious thumping in the election, just like they did in 2006. So much for your credibility on that topic.

Over the months that turned into years the kool-aid drinkers and moonbats have now proven they have zero credibility. Their claims are false. Their opinions are groundless, absent of reason and frequently just more lies. Their only accomplishments over the past eight years is to conclusively prove they’re half-wits about George W. Bush, get a most righteous thumping in the 2006 national election, and two years later lose ground in the Senate and Congress, and get creamed in the presidential election. Some list of accomplishments!

Yet here they are, barking at the moon again, only now it’s just before an audience of other tinfoil hat wearers down at their trailer park. No one else would consider the opinions of individuals that so willingly squandered their credibility over the years to have any worth at all. Poor losers, experienced losers, but still poor losers and boo-hoo babies spewing their doom and gloom predictions.

Quite funny, in a pathetic sense.

Anything to say about the change, or is a circumstantial ad hominem attack the best you can do?
 
Oh ya, it's coming...frickin' change! It's hear, can ya FEEEEEEL it.

Frickin' dems are evil but far left, power hungry dems are just pure satanic to the bone!

Now watch a liberal quote something from the Bush years to defend this empty suit BHO, whose policies smell of B.O.!
Nahhhhhhhh.....we're too distracted by the smell o' FAUX Noise.

:rolleyes:
 
Werbung:
Anything to say about the change, or is a circumstantial ad hominem attack the best you can do?

It's the best a deranged liberal could ever do. Just look at his other posts. Much like the other far left, they need to reference Bush. It's all they have.

I mean, they certainly cannot defend the anointed one, except to say, he is great, look at the change, isn't it shiny?
 
Back
Top