So I'm supposed to take the time to list all of the reasons, facts, and cites as to why "Bridgegate" is BS in EVERY thread on the Forum just because you're too lazy to look in the other 3 or 4 threads where I've already posted it, or to even take the time to do some basic research on the subject to find out if you actually know WTF you're talking about or not?
What do you want me to do, hold your hand and walk you around showing you how to do basic research like you were a 5 year old on his first day in the Public Library?
Here's a BETTER idea, why don't we have the Mods and Admin to a bit of housecleaning, and create a "Palin" sub-Forum, with it's own "Bridgegate" thread, and put it all in there so that you won't get so confused having to look it up HERE, HERE, and HERE.
Now, if you need more information to PROVE that Palin isn't in any way responsible for the bridge debacle, you can always read up on the FACTS as published in the Anchorage and Juneau papers, like I did.
Now you tell me this, if Congress had killed an earmark for $223 million for the bridge, but given the money back to Alaska under the Murkowski administration, over a year before she even ran for Governor, and the bridge costs had grown to nearly $400 million for the bridge, how is that HER fault? How is it "flip-flopping" if the previous administration SQUANDERED the money on other projects, leaving her with no choice but to abandon the project?
What the CNN article fails to include in it's summary of Palins statement (in full HERE) is the following;
