Please list election "errors" favorig Dems, election "errors" favoring Repubs

Little-Acorn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
2,444
Location
San Diego, CA
Here's a thread that I hope everyone will contribute to.

Now that Early Voting has started in many areas, we've heard of "errors" that come up with voting machines that seem to automatically vote for certain candidates when the voter didn't want it that way, and had to be corrected. Some of them took a LOT of correcting. Did they automatically come up with all Democrats until corrected? Or all Republicans until corrected? Or a mix of the two?

Also "errors" where ballots that were supposed to be mailed to remote locations for people to vote, somehow didn't get mailed, or were mailed too late etc. Were the people in those remote locations mostly Democrat, mostly Republican, or approx. 50/50, or etc.?

And other "errors".

So far, literally ALL of these "errors" I've heard of, favored the Democrats for some reason. But I certainly haven't heard of every last one of them.

Have you seen a report of oddball occurrances like these? Please post a brief note in this thread. Keep it short: A one-line description, the words FAVORING DEMOCRATS or FAVORING REPUBLICANS, and a link to the report. This brevity will make it easier for people to scan the list and see if the "error" they are about to post, has already been reported.

Please don't re-post things that are already in this thread, OK?

I'll start it off. Lay on, MacDuff!
 
Werbung:
Voter fraud is not likely to favor the Rs. We know the Socialists (Dems) believe in "the ends justify the means" and with SEIU union thugs "controlling" the voting machines, its a foregone conclusion.


Now there's absolutely no independently verified evidence of chicanery with the voting machines (yet), but it is worth noting that the voting machine technicians in Clark County are members of the Service Employees International Union. The SEIU spent $63 million in elections in 2008 and is planning on spending $44 million more this election cycle -- nearly all of that on Democrats. White House political director Patrick Gaspard is formerly the SEIU's top lobbyist, and former SEIU president Andy Stern was the most frequent visitor to the White House last year.

Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...-members-of-SEIU-105815608.html#ixzz13aREQOAR
 
Only three examples so far???

Surely with all the talk we've heard, there must be more reports that can be linked to.

Come on, folks! Post some more!
 
Only three examples so far???

Surely with all the talk we've heard, there must be more reports that can be linked to.

Come on, folks! Post some more!

don't pretend you care. you don't...you never cared before when many where illegaly told they could not vote in Florida did you? you know when if they had, Bush would have lost? its funny how you only conveniently care when its your side...and even then you act like its the systems computers all rigged to get you, when any sense of logic shows your wrong..I am sure you cared a great deal when the Green party guy got listed as rich whitey right? no of course not...he is not a tea party backed republican...you don't care if right wing groups are out trying to harass voters about eligibility..selectively of course...realy you just care about republicans...thats about it.
 
Still nothing, but some groupie's inebriated fibs and wishful thinking.

C'mon folks, the election is almost here. Let's get them on the record!
 
Werbung:
Back
Top