Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

Dr. Who, why do you contend that this proposal would be applied by bureaucrats unevenly and unfairly?

Why would you believe this proposal result in some companies receiving more special treatment and greater upsetting the balance of the market?

This proposal is market rather than government driven, granting government no policy discretion and thus cannot choose winners or losers.

This proposal would be of advantage to any U.S. enterprise that competes or aspires to compete with foreign goods within or beyond our borders. It’s not limited to producers of goods. If a U.S. producer of service products should compete with foreign goods, this proposal would be of advantage to them.

This may seem as a boon only for exporters of USA goods but it’s actually an indirect but effective export subsidy and the trade proposal’s entirely funded by U.S. purchasers of foreign goods. Due to other competing exporters of U.S. goods and foreign purchasers of U.S. goods negotiations, the prices of U.S. exports will be reduced but export volumes will be increased; everyone gains.

Respectfully, Supposn

<blockquote data-quote="Supposn" data-source="post: 158987" data-attributes="member: 2314">Dr. Who, why do you contend that this proposal would be applied by bureaucrats unevenly and unfairly?Why would you believe this proposal result in some companies receiving more special treatment and greater upsetting the balance of the market?This proposal is market rather than government driven, granting government no policy discretion and thus cannot choose winners or losers.This proposal would be of advantage to any U.S. enterprise that competes or aspires to compete with foreign goods within or beyond our borders.&nbsp; It’s not limited to producers of goods.&nbsp; If a U.S. producer of service products should compete with foreign goods, this proposal would be of advantage to them.This may seem as a boon only for exporters of USA goods but it’s actually an indirect but effective export subsidy and the trade proposal’s entirely funded by U.S. purchasers of foreign goods.&nbsp; Due to other competing exporters of U.S. goods and foreign purchasers of U.S. goods negotiations, the prices of U.S. exports will be reduced but export volumes will be increased; everyone gains.Respectfully, Supposn</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Supposn, post: 158987, member: 2314"] Dr. Who, why do you contend that this proposal would be applied by bureaucrats unevenly and unfairly? Why would you believe this proposal result in some companies receiving more special treatment and greater upsetting the balance of the market? This proposal is market rather than government driven, granting government no policy discretion and thus cannot choose winners or losers. This proposal would be of advantage to any U.S. enterprise that competes or aspires to compete with foreign goods within or beyond our borders. It’s not limited to producers of goods. If a U.S. producer of service products should compete with foreign goods, this proposal would be of advantage to them. This may seem as a boon only for exporters of USA goods but it’s actually an indirect but effective export subsidy and the trade proposal’s entirely funded by U.S. purchasers of foreign goods. Due to other competing exporters of U.S. goods and foreign purchasers of U.S. goods negotiations, the prices of U.S. exports will be reduced but export volumes will be increased; everyone gains. Respectfully, Supposn [/QUOTE]

Verification