Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

Trade deficits are always detrimental to their nations’ GDPs.

GenSeneca, with my best efforts I’ve strived to explain why and how global trade deficits are detrimental and surpluses contribute to their nations’ GDPs. Additionally I’ve explained how and why nations’ global trade imbalance amounts to significant extents understate their affects upon their nations’ GDPs. Due to the conventionally accepted definition and calculation of GDP, the logical mathematical conclusion rather than a more subjective conclusion, (i.e. an opinion) is trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nation’s GDP.

Thus even if you should accept that GDP’s as a direct aggregate or per capita indicator of the nation’s economic condition, you reject the concept of nations’ global trade imbalances affecting their GDPs. This rejection logically leads you to reject global trade deficits’ detriments to their nations’ economies.

Due to these afore mentioned rejections there’s no reason or point to discussing (with regard to nations’ global trade imbalances), the additional fallacies or contradictions within the remainder of your messages.

You’re absolutely satisfied with our seeking pure free trade.

Respectfully, Supposn

<blockquote data-quote="Supposn" data-source="post: 159106" data-attributes="member: 2314">Trade deficits are always detrimental to their nations’ GDPs.GenSeneca, with my best efforts I’ve strived to explain why and how global trade deficits are detrimental and surpluses contribute to their nations’ GDPs.&nbsp; Additionally I’ve explained how and why nations’ global trade imbalance amounts to significant extents understate their affects upon their nations’ GDPs.&nbsp; Due to the conventionally accepted definition and calculation of GDP, the logical mathematical conclusion rather than a more subjective conclusion, (i.e. an opinion) is trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nation’s GDP.Thus even if you should accept that GDP’s as a direct aggregate or per capita indicator of the nation’s economic condition, you reject the concept of nations’ global trade imbalances affecting their GDPs.&nbsp; This rejection logically leads you to reject global trade deficits’ detriments to their nations’ economies.Due to these afore mentioned rejections there’s no reason or point to discussing (with regard to nations’ global trade imbalances), the additional fallacies or contradictions within the remainder of your messages.&nbsp;&nbsp; You’re absolutely satisfied with our seeking pure free trade.Respectfully, Supposn</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Supposn, post: 159106, member: 2314"] [b]Trade deficits are always detrimental to their nations’ GDPs.[/b] GenSeneca, with my best efforts I’ve strived to explain why and how global trade deficits are detrimental and surpluses contribute to their nations’ GDPs. Additionally I’ve explained how and why nations’ global trade imbalance amounts to significant extents understate their affects upon their nations’ GDPs. Due to the conventionally accepted definition and calculation of GDP, the logical mathematical conclusion rather than a more subjective conclusion, (i.e. an opinion) is trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nation’s GDP. Thus even if you should accept that GDP’s as a direct aggregate or per capita indicator of the nation’s economic condition, you reject the concept of nations’ global trade imbalances affecting their GDPs. This rejection logically leads you to reject global trade deficits’ detriments to their nations’ economies. Due to these afore mentioned rejections there’s no reason or point to discussing (with regard to nations’ global trade imbalances), the additional fallacies or contradictions within the remainder of your messages. You’re absolutely satisfied with our seeking pure free trade. Respectfully, Supposn [/QUOTE]

Verification