Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

Re: Trade deficits are always detrimental to their nations’ GDPs.

GenSeneca, there are many instances within our laws where contracts are deemed to be illegal despite the fact that the principles entered into the agreements for what they believe to be to their own advantages.

In most cases the principles are generally correct. The contract has been by law deemed to be illegal because the law has decreed that the activities or agreements are contrary to our societies best interests.

Our purchases of cheaper foreign goods are generally to the advantage of both ourselves and the seller. Our trade deficit is detrimental to our society’s economy. That’s the legal justification for this trade proposal.

Your assumption that because aggregate commercial agreements and activities are likely to be to most principles' financial advantages they are all also to societies' net aggregate economic advantages. It ain’t necessarily so. Sometimes individual and public goals coincide and sometimes they diverge.

Respectfully, Supposn

<blockquote data-quote="Supposn" data-source="post: 159273" data-attributes="member: 2314">Re: Trade deficits are always detrimental to their nations’ GDPs.GenSeneca, there are many instances within our laws where contracts are deemed to be illegal despite the fact that the principles entered into the agreements for what they believe to be to their own advantages.In most cases the principles are generally correct.&nbsp; The contract has been by law deemed to be illegal because the law has decreed that the activities or agreements are contrary to our societies best interests.Our purchases of cheaper foreign goods are generally to the advantage of both ourselves and the seller.&nbsp; Our trade deficit is detrimental to our society’s economy.&nbsp; That’s the legal justification for this trade proposal.Your assumption that because aggregate commercial agreements and activities are likely to be to most principles&#039; financial advantages they are all also to societies&#039; net aggregate economic advantages.&nbsp; It&nbsp; ain’t necessarily so.&nbsp; Sometimes individual and public goals coincide and sometimes they diverge.Respectfully, Supposn</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Supposn, post: 159273, member: 2314"] [b]Re: Trade deficits are always detrimental to their nations’ GDPs.[/b] GenSeneca, there are many instances within our laws where contracts are deemed to be illegal despite the fact that the principles entered into the agreements for what they believe to be to their own advantages. In most cases the principles are generally correct. The contract has been by law deemed to be illegal because the law has decreed that the activities or agreements are contrary to our societies best interests. Our purchases of cheaper foreign goods are generally to the advantage of both ourselves and the seller. Our trade deficit is detrimental to our society’s economy. That’s the legal justification for this trade proposal. Your assumption that because aggregate commercial agreements and activities are likely to be to most principles' financial advantages they are all also to societies' net aggregate economic advantages. It ain’t necessarily so. Sometimes individual and public goals coincide and sometimes they diverge. Respectfully, Supposn [/QUOTE]

Verification