Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs.

GenSeneca, I’m a proponent of an Import Certificate trade proposal that excludes the value of precious or scarce minerals integral to any assessments’ of goods. (It’s would not be applicable to specifically listed precious metals, ores, gems and petroleum.
I suppose you’re aware of this but chose to insert oil into the discussion anyway.

Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs and those detriments’ are generally understated.

Your empirical statistics may be facts. Your conclusions based upon those statistics are opinions; I believe in this case you’ve reversed cause and effect. For further discussion with regard to this facet of trade deficits and the value of the U.S. dollar, refer to messages #42 and #43.

Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs and those detriments’ are generally understated.

My repeating the truth or your rejection of my arguments supporting that assertion does not reduce the truth's validity. Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs and those detriments’ are generally understated.

Respectfully, Supposn

<blockquote data-quote="Supposn" data-source="post: 159775" data-attributes="member: 2314">Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs.GenSeneca, I’m a proponent of an Import Certificate trade proposal that excludes the value of precious or scarce minerals integral to any assessments’ of goods.&nbsp; (It’s would not be applicable to specifically listed precious metals, ores, gems and petroleum.I suppose you’re aware of this but chose to insert oil into the discussion anyway.Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs and those detriments’ are generally understated.Your empirical statistics may be facts.&nbsp; Your conclusions based upon those statistics are opinions; I believe in this case you’ve reversed cause and effect. For further discussion with regard to this facet of trade deficits and the value of the U.S. dollar, refer to messages #42 and #43.Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs and those detriments’ are generally understated.My repeating the truth or your rejection of my arguments supporting that assertion does not reduce the truth&#039;s validity.&nbsp; Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs and those detriments’ are generally understated.Respectfully, Supposn</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Supposn, post: 159775, member: 2314"] [b]Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs.[/b] GenSeneca, I’m a proponent of an Import Certificate trade proposal that excludes the value of precious or scarce minerals integral to any assessments’ of goods. (It’s would not be applicable to specifically listed precious metals, ores, gems and petroleum. I suppose you’re aware of this but chose to insert oil into the discussion anyway. Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs and those detriments’ are generally understated. Your empirical statistics may be facts. Your conclusions based upon those statistics are opinions; I believe in this case you’ve reversed cause and effect. For further discussion with regard to this facet of trade deficits and the value of the U.S. dollar, refer to messages #42 and #43. Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs and those detriments’ are generally understated. [I] My repeating the truth or your rejection of my arguments supporting that assertion does not reduce the truth's validity. Trade deficits are ALWAYS detrimental to their nations’ GDPs and those detriments’ are generally understated. Respectfully, Supposn[/i] [/QUOTE]

Verification