Wrong. Your statement is contradicted by the empirical data and you offer no explanation for the contradiction. You have disregarded the facts by claiming them to be opinion and in the processs, attached yourself to the losing end of an argument about what constitutes causal language.
Yet you have claimed, repeatedly, that imports are a detriment to GDP.
You're admitting that your entire argument is based on something other than facts.
Lets see it. If you are actually capable of formulating a logical argument, then present your argument as a logical equation. I don't believe you are capable of doing that. I think you, like so many other people, simply claim "logic" as the basis of your opinions but don't actually employ logic when formulating your conclusions.
Your income ALWAYS has a detrimental affect on my income. I cannot qualify that statement in any way (offer facts to support my conclusion), I also cannot quantify that statement (cite the degree of detrimental impact), but I'm going to claim that I have unstated "logical reasons" for holding this totally irrational belief.
That's the level of absurdity contained in your "logical" argument.
