Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

I'm still trying to figure out how the truth is a stupid thing to say?

All this is is the Lunatic Right trying to churn something up out of nothing.

Let's look at the facts here OK? Harry Reed wasn't name calling or belittling the then candidate Obama in any way. He was stating the facts that the American electorate (enough of it to win the election) would embrace Obama... which they did.

Does anyone in here really REALLY think that if President Obama looked and talked like Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction he'd still have been electable?

[media=youtube]ojTKkfgvwvU[/media]

Fact is there are electable qualities and non-electable qualities in both Black & White people and President Obama was on the electable side. This White guy ain't getting elected President either. That's just not electable looks or behavior.

[media=youtube]Hcio3l6kwrU[/media]

As far a Tent Lott his case was totally different. He said that the country would have been better off if Strom Thurmon and the Dixiecrats (segregationists) had stayed in power. Now that's a real racist problem.

<blockquote data-quote="top gun" data-source="post: 125472" data-attributes="member: 428">I&#039;m still trying to figure out how the truth is a stupid thing to say?<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:"&nbsp; data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" />All this is is the Lunatic Right trying to churn something up out of nothing. Let&#039;s look at the facts here OK? Harry Reed wasn&#039;t name calling or belittling the then candidate Obama in any way. He was stating the facts that the American electorate (enough of it to win the election) would embrace Obama... which they did.Does anyone in here really REALLY think that if President Obama looked and talked like Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction he&#039;d still have been electable? [media=youtube]ojTKkfgvwvU[/media]Fact is there are electable qualities and non-electable qualities in both Black &amp; White people and President Obama was on the electable side. This White guy ain&#039;t getting elected President either. That&#039;s just not electable looks or behavior.[media=youtube]Hcio3l6kwrU[/media]As far a Tent Lott his case was totally different. He said that the country would have been better off if Strom Thurmon and the Dixiecrats (segregationists) had stayed in power. Now that&#039;s a real racist problem. </blockquote>

[QUOTE="top gun, post: 125472, member: 428"] [COLOR="Navy"][B]I'm still trying to figure out how the truth is a stupid thing to say?:confused:[/B] All this is is the Lunatic Right trying to churn something up out of nothing. Let's look at the facts here OK? Harry Reed wasn't name calling or belittling the then candidate Obama in any way. He was stating the facts that the American electorate (enough of it to win the election) would embrace Obama... which they did. [B]Does anyone in here really REALLY think that if President Obama looked and talked like Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction he'd still have been electable? [/B] [media=youtube]ojTKkfgvwvU[/media] Fact is there are electable qualities and non-electable qualities in both Black & White people and President Obama was on the electable side. This White guy ain't getting elected President either. That's just not electable looks or behavior. [media=youtube]Hcio3l6kwrU[/media] As far a Tent Lott his case was totally different. He said that the country would have been better off if Strom Thurmon and the Dixiecrats (segregationists) had stayed in power. [B]Now that's a real racist problem. [/B][/COLOR][B][/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification