Reply to thread

I am sorry, but you did not answer MY question:  Did the Court lie about a zygote not being alive?  As a matter of biology, a zygote inherits DNA; therefore, as a matter of biology, a zygote is alive.  However, the Court held that a zygote is not alive as a matter of constitutional law.  Therefore, a zygote cannot inherit DNA as a matter of constitutional law.  Unless, of course, the Court lied about a zygote not being alive.  Did the Court lie about a zygote not being alive?