Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

I already did: >>>At conception, a man passes his DNA to his child. Clearly, a child inherits hereditary traits at conception. Therefore, a child is an organism from conception. See the case of Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. (United States Supreme Court 2013) (“Genes form the basis for hereditary traits in living organisms.”). Therefore, from conception, a child is a member of the human species. See the case of Planned Parenthood v. Rounds (US Eighth Circuit 2008) (The appellate court sustained the constitutionality of a statute that defines a human being as "an individual living member of the species of Homo sapiens, including the unborn human being during the entire embryonic and fetal ages from fertilization to full gestation."). Therefore, from conception, a child is a person within the meaning of the law. See the case of Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji (United States Supreme Court 1987) (A person within the meaning of the law is a member who is “genetically part of an ethnically and physiognomically distinctive subgrouping of homo sapiens.”<<< How did you miss it?

<blockquote data-quote="LegalFictions" data-source="post: 250490" data-attributes="member: 5151"><p>I already did:&nbsp; &gt;&gt;&gt;At conception, a man passes his DNA to his child. Clearly, a child inherits hereditary traits at conception. Therefore, a child is an organism from conception. See the case of Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. (United States Supreme Court 2013) (“Genes form the basis for hereditary traits in living organisms.”). Therefore, from conception, a child is a member of the human species. See the case of Planned Parenthood v. Rounds (US Eighth Circuit 2008) (The appellate court sustained the constitutionality of a statute that defines a human being as &quot;an individual living member of the species of Homo sapiens, including the unborn human being during the entire embryonic and fetal ages from fertilization to full gestation.&quot;). Therefore, from conception, a child is a person within the meaning of the law. See the case of Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji (United States Supreme Court 1987) (A person within the meaning of the law is a member who is “genetically part of an ethnically and physiognomically distinctive subgrouping of homo sapiens.”&lt;&lt;&lt;&nbsp; How did you miss it?</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="LegalFictions, post: 250490, member: 5151"] I already did: >>>At conception, a man passes his DNA to his child. Clearly, a child inherits hereditary traits at conception. Therefore, a child is an organism from conception. See the case of Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. (United States Supreme Court 2013) (“Genes form the basis for hereditary traits in living organisms.”). Therefore, from conception, a child is a member of the human species. See the case of Planned Parenthood v. Rounds (US Eighth Circuit 2008) (The appellate court sustained the constitutionality of a statute that defines a human being as "an individual living member of the species of Homo sapiens, including the unborn human being during the entire embryonic and fetal ages from fertilization to full gestation."). Therefore, from conception, a child is a person within the meaning of the law. See the case of Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji (United States Supreme Court 1987) (A person within the meaning of the law is a member who is “genetically part of an ethnically and physiognomically distinctive subgrouping of homo sapiens.”<<< How did you miss it? [/QUOTE]

Verification