Reply to thread

So the baby of rape has a right to live as a parasite on an unwilling host. You also neglected to address my analogy of your cancer.



A parasite should not have the right to live on an unwilling host. You would not accept that for yourself, but yet you demand that of women.



Cojoined twins are equals, one is not necessarily a parasite on the other, but in a number of cases, the one that was least viable was sacrificed to save the life of the other.  In all of this discussion there has been no recognition that the Mother may have other children and the weight of carrying another child--in a culture that allows the Father to escape--may endanger not only her ability to earn a living--in a culture that forces Mothers to fend for themselves while mouthing respect for life and all the stuff you've been saying--and care for her other children.



Right here you jumped from a parasite inside a person's body to a fully realized human being able to live without its biological Mother.  You jumped from a non-viable fetus to a viable person.  We end up discussing two different things.  You should read about the Romanian dictator, he felt much the same way as you are writing here.  Women were breeders and bore all the responsibility for children--whether by consentual sex or rape, it made no difference.  Men got a free-pass, and here you are saying the same thing. Maybe you will begin to realize why women would never pass a law condemning them to breeder servitude as you seem to be demanding. 



When you are raped and then required to carry the baby of that assault for 9 months in your body and then go through the pain of birth and care for that child until it can be adopted, then you can talk to me about ownership, until then you are a virgin lecturing on sex.



If the Mother wishes to keep the child and isn't requiring the Father to carry it inside his body for 9 months, then no, I don't think he does have the right to kill it.  There is no way to get equality in this situation, there is a biological barrier that we can as yet not breach and THAT IS WHY THE WOMAN SHOULD HAVE THE FINAL SAY instead of a man who doesn't know what he's talking about.  Anything is easy for the person who doesn't have to do it.  Father's throw babies out of their lives every single day and the only reason that those babies don't die is that their Mothers are there to save them--however reluctantly.  And you think this is ok, women should be required to clean up after men's fun--even if it is rape. 



But you neglected to say when that happens. Conception?


Back
Top