I answer any and all questions that are germain to the issue. I won't, however, support your attempt to make killiing acceptable contingent on other's willingness to care for those who are being killed. Unless of course you wish to admit that you believe that is the case and will explain the rational behind that belief.
What bad things did I call you mare? In fact, I don't believe I actually called you a liar. I pointed out lies, but I don't think I called you a liar. I do welcome you to bring forward any bad things I have called you and will gladly apologize for them if they are not true.
I am interested in the discussion and interested in what lies behind your convoluted and conflicted philosophy mare. You entered the conversation, said a lot of things you can't explain, and when I didn't give you a pass on them, you dropped any pretense of discussion of the topic and instead began a string of quite vile personal attacks on me. That is interesting. Very interesting indeed.
Actually mare, I said that I have had a "very pleasant life" and said nothing about my family, love, or fulfillment (although I have been married to a wonderful woman for nearly 40 years). Why do you find it necessary to be dishonest about even the most basic things? Surely you were able to read and understand the words that I wrote, they said what I ment to say. Why did you find it necessary to reinterpret them into something other than what I said? You do that a lot and my bet is that all the "nasty" things you believe I have called you are no more than your own interpretation of not so nasty things that I have actually said. And that is very interesting as well.
I have asked you before mare to bring forward any "nasty" things I have called you and you have yet to bring forward anything at all. You keep making the claim but don't offer any evidence at all. Didn't you chide Chip for exactly the same thing? More hypocricy.
