Reply to thread

If the jury is in, and has found that CO2 is guilty, then the jury has completely disregarded the physical evidence.  There isn't a single bit of physical, observable, evidence that shows that CO2 is responsible for raising the earth's temperature.  Every bit of evidence collected, shows clearly that rising CO2 levels lag behind temperature increases.


We are in the relatively early stages of a natural warming cycle that will eventually melt the ice at both poles.  When this warming period began, glaciers extended over most of the northern hemisphere.  Tell me, Mr. Judge and jury, exactly who was responsible for melting the ice back over 2000 miles before we ever got out of the bronze age?


Back
Top