Reply to thread

You provided what might have been considered fact 50 years ago since that was the average age of your reference material.


Just to refresh your memory, here were the first of the sources I provided:


http://www.cannabisclub.ca/articles/...l_lancet_1.pdf


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...&dopt=Abstract


http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/1999/...pot991217.html


http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/c...act/90/16/1198


http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/con...ract/8/12/1071


http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/83/4/637.pdf



You do like to go on about how I divert topics.  The topic on this thread is global warming.  Do you have anything to contribute or not.  You claim that the sources I provide are not factual.  Prove it.  Or are you going to continue to divert the topic on this thread?


Back
Top