There's nothing in there about the government being IN the game, and in fact the writings of the Father of the Constitution (and most of the other founders) make it clear that the government was to have NO part in anything that was not specifically listed in the Constitution.
And we all know how well that worked out.
Why would you even consider it when the entire concept has been discredited in every country that it's been attempted?
What makes you think that they can't produce more than you?
Nothing like quoting from the NAZI PARTY PLATFORM to enhance your credibility on social issues. 
That's what Chapter 11 Bankruptcy laws are for. It's not the place of the government to spend taxpayers money to bail out private business.
Which is exactly where Obama wants us to be.
Define "necessary", while you're at it, define "constitutional" and show us where it allows the government to be involved in the first place.
They didn't start off as bad as they eventually got, but they started somewhere, and we're seeing the parallels.
Wal-Mart again? So all the work, and money that Sam Walton plowed into a company that he built, and all the work, and money that his family plowed into expanding the company should be cut out of the rewards of their work in favor of people who haven't put in nearly the work or money? The people who created the wealth are the WALTONS! The people who work for Wal-Mart, or any other company for that matter, asked for the job, agreed to the hours and wages to perform that job, and at the end of their shift they go home. They're not putting in 80-100 hours a week, or plowing their own money back into the business, creating more jobs for more people, so your entire argument is BOGUS.
Don't you believe in LIBERTY? It's their CHOICE if they choose to use alcohol, tobacco, or eat transfats, and who are you to tell them they can't, or to impose a "sin tax" on those products? How would you feel if the tables were reversed?
I support following the constitution. That means restricting the federal government to it's original bounds, and leaving everything else to the people or the states respectively.
I have no doubt, but the biggest flaw I see in your perspective is that the government is the one that created the problems to begin with, and now you're looking to them to fix those same said problems!
