Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Actually it's quite easy to argue. The more numerous the reactors the more choice and access terrorists would gain to causing widespread harm..Nukes are not the answer. Why people are ADAMANTLY against putting less money into equally viable safe alternatives is beginning to really pique my curiousity. Are they investment speculators in nuclear energy? Do they hold stocks in nuclear and want expansion? What is the addiction to this collosal mistake in energy production given the fact that we monkeys seem hellbent on destruction?It's why I keep pointing out the Homer Simpson scenario. Let's take a fraction of the money needed to build and reinforce, run and dispose of toxic waste and environmental impacts of nuclear power and sink it into solar, wind, hydro and geothermal. Let's take another fraction of that money and invest it in researching other viable and safe alternatives.If Homer Simpson falls asleep at the controls of the steam-generator, it's just not going to make headlines like if he falls asleep at the controls of the nuclear reactor.The human factor, that and unbelievable startup and maintenance costs and terrorist risk is why nuclear won't work...nevermind the thousands of protestors who will dust off their signs and show up to block bulldozers and their construction site.
Actually it's quite easy to argue. The more numerous the reactors the more choice and access terrorists would gain to causing widespread harm..
Nukes are not the answer. Why people are ADAMANTLY against putting less money into equally viable safe alternatives is beginning to really pique my curiousity. Are they investment speculators in nuclear energy? Do they hold stocks in nuclear and want expansion? What is the addiction to this collosal mistake in energy production given the fact that we monkeys seem hellbent on destruction?
It's why I keep pointing out the Homer Simpson scenario. Let's take a fraction of the money needed to build and reinforce, run and dispose of toxic waste and environmental impacts of nuclear power and sink it into solar, wind, hydro and geothermal. Let's take another fraction of that money and invest it in researching other viable and safe alternatives.
If Homer Simpson falls asleep at the controls of the steam-generator, it's just not going to make headlines like if he falls asleep at the controls of the nuclear reactor.
The human factor, that and unbelievable startup and maintenance costs and terrorist risk is why nuclear won't work...nevermind the thousands of protestors who will dust off their signs and show up to block bulldozers and their construction site.
