Dear Sil... last time you questioned my sources of information, I formed a two post long thread on Geothermal power, complete with sources for every single point I made. You not only didn't answer, but still have yet to provide even one... just one... substance backed counter point to anything I said.
If you want me to provide another completely documented, linked, supported, evidence backed post, I will do so. Unlike some here, I don't say things unless I have seen evidence and researched the topic myself.
The real quest though is, why is it your posts never meet the high standards of links and documented evidence, that you dismiss others for not having? Why is this high requirement of professional research quality posts, only required by people who disagree with you, but not for yourself, or those that support your views? Why the double standard? Why do we have to accept your statements on faith, or with scant circumstantial evidence?
Here's a thought: How about you provide the clear documented evidence that BigOil coerced Toyota to drop the RAV4 EV? Where are your links proving the massive profits from GM's EV1? What evidence do you cite of this supposed massive demand for an 80 mile max, 2 seat, zero trunk, 4-hour recharge, nearly $100K car? Do you have anything?
You let me know, I'll be more than happy to write out another post you won't respond to, or will only make passing substance-less remarks about.
