Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
What is not surprising is your failure to answer the question, and instead rely on some mindless babbling.However, you are the one who cited it as some form of authority. Then too, you seem to have no clue as to what "Godwin's Law" is. In fact, when your fellow traveler in the dark world of "no nothings" declared me to be a "socialist" (such a tremor of fear encompassed my whole being even at the very thought), you said nothing even though "Godwin's Law" could just as easily apply to such a comment. However, people such as yourself who lack the ability to have an intelligent, and rational, debate, now have this "jingoism" to counter the 4-letter "N" word, "Nazi". So now my ideas, or that of any other, "nazi like". Now you can rest easy knowing you need not refute my point. You merely speak the new "jingoism" "Godwin's Law'. You seem to think that it is never fair to use the term "Nazi" or "Nazilike". Thus, true scholarly analysis then becomes uninformed idiocy.
What is not surprising is your failure to answer the question, and instead rely on some mindless babbling.
However, you are the one who cited it as some form of authority. Then too, you seem to have no clue as to what "Godwin's Law" is. In fact, when your fellow traveler in the dark world of "no nothings" declared me to be a "socialist" (such a tremor of fear encompassed my whole being even at the very thought), you said nothing even though "Godwin's Law" could just as easily apply to such a comment. However, people such as yourself who lack the ability to have an intelligent, and rational, debate, now have this "jingoism" to counter the 4-letter "N" word, "Nazi". So now my ideas, or that of any other, "nazi like". Now you can rest easy knowing you need not refute my point. You merely speak the new "jingoism" "Godwin's Law'. You seem to think that it is never fair to use the term "Nazi" or "Nazilike". Thus, true scholarly analysis then becomes uninformed idiocy.
