Terrorists attack Venezuelan ship in international waters

Stalin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
3,946
as is usual, reality is an inconvenience when manufacturing state sponsored terrorism

the bogus charge of terrorism is just a fig-leaf to justify imperial intervention south of the border, just like the good old days

"..Donald Trump said on Monday that the United States had carried out a strike on a second Venezuelan boat and killed three alleged terrorists he claimed were transporting drugs, expanding his administration’s war against drug cartels and the scope of lethal military force to stop them.

The US president gave few details about the strike, saying in a social media post that the action was on his orders and that it had happened earlier in the morning. The post was accompanied by a video clip showing the boat, which appeared to be stationary, erupting into a fireball.


“The strike occurred while these confirmed narco-terroists from Venezuela were in International Waters transporting illegal narcotics (A DEADLY WEAPON POISONING AMERICANS!) headed to the US,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Trump’s announcement of the strike appeared to be worded in a way to suggest there was a valid legal basis for the strike – an issue that became a source of heavy criticism in Washington after the operation against the first alleged Venezuelan drug boat earlier this month, which killed 11 people.

According to people familiar with the matter, the administration briefed Congress last week that the first strike was legal under the president’s article 2 powers because it involved a boat connected to the Tren de Aragua gang, which Trump designated a foreign terrorist organization.

The administration has provided little evidence that the first boat was carrying illegal drugs beyond asserting they had tracked the drugs being loaded on to the boat in order to be distributed in the United States, even if the boat at one point was said to have turned around.

Asked on Sunday about that first strike and claims it was a fishing vessel, Trump said in response to questions from the Guardian: “You saw the bags of white. It’s nonsense. So we knew it before they even left. We knew exactly where that boat, where it came from, where the drugs came from and where it was heading.”

By claiming, for the strike on the second boat, that the drugs were a threat to the United States and asserting that the boat’s crew were “terrorists”, Trump appeared to be preemptively setting the groundwork to make the same Article II legal claim to order a missile strike against the second boat.

The latest strike comes as the US continues a massive buildup of forces around Venezuela. Over the weekend, five F-35 fighter jets arrived in Puerto Rico to join about half a dozen US navy destroyers already moved to the US territory recently, and support assets the administration said had been deployed to disrupt the flow of illegal drugs.


comrade stalin
moscow
 
Werbung:
as is usual, reality is an inconvenience when manufacturing state sponsored terrorism

the bogus charge of terrorism is just a fig-leaf to justify imperial intervention south of the border, just like the good old days

"..Donald Trump said on Monday that the United States had carried out a strike on a second Venezuelan boat and killed three alleged terrorists he claimed were transporting drugs, expanding his administration’s war against drug cartels and the scope of lethal military force to stop them.

The US president gave few details about the strike, saying in a social media post that the action was on his orders and that it had happened earlier in the morning. The post was accompanied by a video clip showing the boat, which appeared to be stationary, erupting into a fireball.


“The strike occurred while these confirmed narco-terroists from Venezuela were in International Waters transporting illegal narcotics (A DEADLY WEAPON POISONING AMERICANS!) headed to the US,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Trump’s announcement of the strike appeared to be worded in a way to suggest there was a valid legal basis for the strike – an issue that became a source of heavy criticism in Washington after the operation against the first alleged Venezuelan drug boat earlier this month, which killed 11 people.

According to people familiar with the matter, the administration briefed Congress last week that the first strike was legal under the president’s article 2 powers because it involved a boat connected to the Tren de Aragua gang, which Trump designated a foreign terrorist organization.

The administration has provided little evidence that the first boat was carrying illegal drugs beyond asserting they had tracked the drugs being loaded on to the boat in order to be distributed in the United States, even if the boat at one point was said to have turned around.

Asked on Sunday about that first strike and claims it was a fishing vessel, Trump said in response to questions from the Guardian: “You saw the bags of white. It’s nonsense. So we knew it before they even left. We knew exactly where that boat, where it came from, where the drugs came from and where it was heading.”

By claiming, for the strike on the second boat, that the drugs were a threat to the United States and asserting that the boat’s crew were “terrorists”, Trump appeared to be preemptively setting the groundwork to make the same Article II legal claim to order a missile strike against the second boat.

The latest strike comes as the US continues a massive buildup of forces around Venezuela. Over the weekend, five F-35 fighter jets arrived in Puerto Rico to join about half a dozen US navy destroyers already moved to the US territory recently, and support assets the administration said had been deployed to disrupt the flow of illegal drugs.


comrade stalin
moscow
yes another drug boat full of plosion on its way to our shores , needs to happen more often start shooting smuggler planes down also
 
as is usual, reality is an inconvenience when manufacturing state sponsored terrorism

the bogus charge of terrorism is just a fig-leaf to justify imperial intervention south of the border, just like the good old days

"..Donald Trump said on Monday that the United States had carried out a strike on a second Venezuelan boat and killed three alleged terrorists he claimed were transporting drugs, expanding his administration’s war against drug cartels and the scope of lethal military force to stop them.

The US president gave few details about the strike, saying in a social media post that the action was on his orders and that it had happened earlier in the morning. The post was accompanied by a video clip showing the boat, which appeared to be stationary, erupting into a fireball.


“The strike occurred while these confirmed narco-terroists from Venezuela were in International Waters transporting illegal narcotics (A DEADLY WEAPON POISONING AMERICANS!) headed to the US,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Trump’s announcement of the strike appeared to be worded in a way to suggest there was a valid legal basis for the strike – an issue that became a source of heavy criticism in Washington after the operation against the first alleged Venezuelan drug boat earlier this month, which killed 11 people.

According to people familiar with the matter, the administration briefed Congress last week that the first strike was legal under the president’s article 2 powers because it involved a boat connected to the Tren de Aragua gang, which Trump designated a foreign terrorist organization.

The administration has provided little evidence that the first boat was carrying illegal drugs beyond asserting they had tracked the drugs being loaded on to the boat in order to be distributed in the United States, even if the boat at one point was said to have turned around.

Asked on Sunday about that first strike and claims it was a fishing vessel, Trump said in response to questions from the Guardian: “You saw the bags of white. It’s nonsense. So we knew it before they even left. We knew exactly where that boat, where it came from, where the drugs came from and where it was heading.”

By claiming, for the strike on the second boat, that the drugs were a threat to the United States and asserting that the boat’s crew were “terrorists”, Trump appeared to be preemptively setting the groundwork to make the same Article II legal claim to order a missile strike against the second boat.

The latest strike comes as the US continues a massive buildup of forces around Venezuela. Over the weekend, five F-35 fighter jets arrived in Puerto Rico to join about half a dozen US navy destroyers already moved to the US territory recently, and support assets the administration said had been deployed to disrupt the flow of illegal drugs.


comrade stalin
moscow
Message to foreign and domestic drug traffickers and violent gang members, President Trump is no longer giving them safe passages or safe havens.
 
Message to foreign and domestic drug traffickers and violent gang members, President Trump is no longer giving them safe passages or safe havens.

Bad new for you and annoyance..the war on drugs has been in operation since nixon

epic fail - both your comments and the war

comrade stalin
moscw
 
Bad new for you and annoyance..the war on drugs has been in operation since nixon

epic fail - both your comments and the war

comrade stalin
moscw
Really? So did Biden just surrender in the war, allowing tons of deadly drugs to flow into the US through his politically opened borders?
 
The war against drugs was lost, largely because of the Sackler Family, Perdue Pharma and the lie that Oxycontin was not addictive.

Not a single Sackler has spent a day in prison. The Sacklers are the richest drug dealers in history.
 
The war against drugs was lost, largely because of the Sackler Family, Perdue Pharma and the lie that Oxycontin was not addictive.

Not a single Sackler has spent a day in prison. The Sacklers are the richest drug dealers in history.
When you say the drug war was lost by such influences are you making a vague reference to Frank Perdue's relationship with Bill Clinton in the reported cocaine trafficking through Mena, Arkansas?
 
Why doesn't Trump throw a Sackler or two in prison? The current epidemic was totally caused by Perdue Pharma, and not a one of them has spent a day in prison, and they STILL OWN AND OPERATE PURDUE PHARMA. They are still profiting from huge profits from Perdue Pharma.

You are the stupidest shit I have ever had the displeasure to meet.
 
Why doesn't Trump throw a Sackler or two in prison? The current epidemic was totally caused by Perdue Pharma, and not a one of them has spent a day in prison, and they STILL OWN AND OPERATE PURDUE PHARMA. They are still profiting from huge profits from Perdue Pharma.

You are the stupidest shit I have ever had the displeasure to meet.
why dont you prove they broke the law dumb asss . these criminals your trying to protect have smuggled poison in America killing 80000 a year on illegal fentanyl 80000 a year that's a lot of people . Mand the Russia pig is crying about it with you he ani america like you as sk him what happened to the pirates they captured would be happy to hear the supply of herion coke meth and fentanyl have been damaged and they will find it hard to find boat drivers lol .
we have every right to blow them up in the open ocean as they are a threat to our nation look at the death and violence in the usa and overseas from drugds dozens murdered weekly
 
..er the topic is terrorism carried out by the frump administration

comrade stalin
moscow
 
allow the pentagram to operate without such pesky things as congressional oversight

this is murder and piracy on the high seas..plain and simple

"..The Department of War is thwarting congressional oversight of the Trump administration’s attack on a boat off the coast of Venezuela earlier this month.

On Monday afternoon, as the full details of the first drone strike remained secret, Trump announced that U.S. forces conducted a second attack on a boat in the U.S. Southern Command are of responsibility, which covers the Caribbean and all of South America. In a post on TruthSocial, he wrote that the strike killed three people. “BE WARNED — IF YOU ARE TRANSPORTING DRUGS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS, WE ARE HUNTING YOU!” he wrote.

Although the president is posting edited videos of these strikes, information about the planning, execution, and legal justification for this campaign on alleged “narcoterrorists” is being kept secret from senior congressional staffers.

Last Tuesday, senior staff from House leadership and relevant committees were barred by the Office of the Secretary of War from attending a briefing on the first attack, according to three government sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The military cited “alternative compensatory control measures” — the term for enhanced security procedures designed to keep information under wraps — as the reason.

The War Department has attempted to conceal numerous details about the attack that killed 11 people in the Caribbean, including the fact that the vessel altered its course and appeared to have turned back toward shore prior to the strikes. Men on board were said to have survived an initial strike, The Intercept reported last week. They were then killed shortly after in a follow-up attack.

“I’m incredibly disturbed by this new reporting that the Trump Administration launched multiple strikes on the boat off Venezuela,” Rep., Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., a member of the House Armed Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Intelligence and Special Operations, said of The Intercept’s coverage. “They didn’t even bother to seek congressional authorization, bragged about these killings — and teased more to come.”

A very small number of Senate and House staffers, mostly from the Armed Services committees, received highly classified briefings about the attack last Tuesday, after the military delayed the meeting for days. Staff for key members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which oversee war powers, were conspicuously absent.


comrade stalin
moscow
 
Why doesn't Trump throw a Sackler or two in prison? The current epidemic was totally caused by Perdue Pharma, and not a one of them has spent a day in prison, and they STILL OWN AND OPERATE PURDUE PHARMA. They are still profiting from huge profits from Perdue Pharma.

You are the stupidest shit I have ever had the displeasure to meet.
Did you mention whether or not you think Clinton should have thrown Perdue and himself in jail for trafficking cocaine through Mena, Arkansas?
 
Werbung:
Back
Top