Reply to thread

The Codex Sinaiticus does not contain the OT.


How does it matter that it is the oldest "complete" NT when we have millions of partial pieces dating back to a few years after the letters were penned and they tell us exactly what was in the original letters?


How in the world would it matter at all if the Codex Sinaiticus which is a copy of the NT differs from the KJV which is a copy and a translation of the old and NT? You might as well be saying that the copy of the constitution at Walgreens is different than the copy of the constitution available at Wal-mart while ignoring that we have the original in the museum.


The history of the Codex Sinaiticus is insignificant compared the the dead sea scrolls and other documents.


Even before we had the dead sea scrolls we had letters from early church fathers who quoted extensively from the original NT letters. Taking all of the quotes we could have re-created just about the entire NT.


If you have fallen for the misdirection of pointing to errors in documents like Codex Sinaiticus by people who fail to account for the useful information available in many many sources besides then you just have to start over at square one in your personal research.


Back
Top