Reply to thread

Doesn't the fact you just said the above highlight remark mean it does promote safety?;)


There has to be some medical tests because everything else would be totally at the officers discrection... that's why the had to come up with medical tests in the first place. Cases where people were impaired were getting thrown out and cases of someone not really impaired but just acting weirdly we being allowed for convictions.


The just thing is to simply have a reasonable baseline legal limit. From all my experience with drinking... and in 52 years it has been significant;)... (.1) was a reasonable limit. I think the prohibition crowd MAD pushing for a (.08) limit was treading into ridiculous territory.


IMO if you are going to allow it to be legal serve alcohol in restaurants then you have to match a law that allows for some consumption and still let the patrons drive home. But there's a big difference in impairment between someone having a couple beers or glasses of wine with dinner and someone sitting in a bar drinking for hours and then driving home. I'm sure you agree.


Back
Top