Uh oh.. get ready to panic over global cooling

dogtowner

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 24, 2009
Messages
17,849
Location
Wandering around
or just accept that climate change up down or sideways is as natural as natural can be

article-2415191-1BAEE1D0000005DC-503_640x366.jpg
 
Werbung:

I often have to wonder at just how much damage one can expect man to do to the environment before one accepts that it is a part of the problem, and quit relying on some fantasy that the earth will clean up mans messes. If you believe in a God created system you must accept that He had the idea as to how the earth could mend itself. Then when you factor in that man has destroyed over 2/3's of the rain forests He created to clean the air (in their search for gold, oil, timber, etc.), and the idea that industrial pollution has been dumped into the rivers, oceans, etc., by the millions of gallons, or how dams have destroyed the natural resources of rivers, etc., just how much does one think the earth can withstand?

Or, you can rely on junk science, and ignore reality, as usual:

A summer cloud cover caused sea ice to return to 2010 levels. 2012 was a record low so 2013 looks larger in comparison. Meanwhile data from buoys (which have no political connections and don't lie) show that the thickness of the ice is continuing to decrease from the bottom up due to rising water temperatures.

http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

The polar ice is melting from the bottom up. But since this data comes from NASA and not KOCHBRO you will probably not read it.


The latest data reveal that Antarctica is losing ice at an accelerating rate, while surface melting recently has decreased. How is this possible?

NASA - Is Antarctica Melting?

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/20100108_Is_Antarctica_Melting.html

There has been lots of talk lately about Antarctica and whether or not the continent's giant ice sheet is melting. One new paper 1, which states there’s less surface melting recently than in past years, has been cited as "proof" that there’s no global warming. Other evidence that the amount of sea ice around Antarctica seems to be increasing slightly 2-4 is being used in the same way. But both of these data points are misleading. Gravity data collected from space using NASA's Grace satellite show that Antarctica has been losing more than a hundred cubic kilometers (24 cubic miles) of ice each year since 2002. The latest data reveal that Antarctica is losing ice at an accelerating rate, too. How is it possible for surface melting to decrease, but for the continent to lose mass anyway? The answer boils down to the fact that ice can flow without melting


You might want to watch this:

http://www.climatecentral.org/watch-62-years-of-global-warming-in-13-seconds-15469.html
 
Or, you can rely on junk science, and ignore reality
And that is exactly what the Global Warming Hoax has proven to be several times over!

There is a reason this hoax is no longer being discussed among rational thinking people today. Only the brainwashed sheeple who believe in "junk science" are still whinning about this "world redistribution of wealth" false ideology!
 
See AL GORE IS A LIAR! All liberals lie!
Of course he's a LIAR .....

He is a self absorbed greedy politician who has been proven too many times to count over to have his head up his own ass ....

Would you realistically expect anything different from some socialist globalist POS like him?
 
And that is exactly what the Global Warming Hoax has proven to be several times over!

There is a reason this hoax is no longer being discussed among rational thinking people today. Only the brainwashed sheeple who believe in "junk science" are still whinning about this "world redistribution of wealth" false ideology!


Two points here.

1. YOUR braindead mind keeps the topic going after another of your braindead sheeple posted the topic.

2. I don't see you presenting any evidence to contradict what I posted. Of course, that would require rational discussion.
 
2. I don't see you presenting any evidence to contradict what I posted. Of course, that would require rational discussion.
This topic has been discussed thoroughly in detail on this site in the past. No rational thinking person wants to rehash this brainwashed ignorance with the irrational wacko libs any longer.

Try democratic underground ..... that is more your speed!
 
If you believe in God you will realize that there is nothing we can do that He cant undo. If you believe in a Christian God you will know that at the end of days it really wont matter about pollution. Even cavemen polluted, or dinos and lets face it, fish have been crapping in the water forever. That being said we could stand to pollute less as it cost money to clean the water not to mention it is kind of ugly and puts a crimp in the food supply (that's something to worry about).
 
If you believe in God you will realize that there is nothing we can do that He cant undo. If you believe in a Christian God you will know that at the end of days it really wont matter about pollution. Even cavemen polluted, or dinos and lets face it, fish have been crapping in the water forever. That being said we could stand to pollute less as it cost money to clean the water not to mention it is kind of ugly and puts a crimp in the food supply (that's something to worry about).
I agree 100% dog ....

As per usual with wacko leftist, if you don' agree wholly with their agenda, then you are a denier, a racist, a bigot, a homophobe or what ever negative label their pea brain can come up with ....

I believe most rational thinking Americans are concerned about pollution and are willing to take steps to limit it. But, as we all know, that is not what the global warming hoax is about .... I am interested in limiting pollution .... I could give a sh*t less about some marxist global wealth redistribution, packaged up in some BS global warming bill of goods that is sold to the sheeple!
 
If you believe in God you will realize that there is nothing we can do that He cant undo. If you believe in a Christian God you will know that at the end of days it really wont matter about pollution. Even cavemen polluted, or dinos and lets face it, fish have been crapping in the water forever. That being said we could stand to pollute less as it cost money to clean the water not to mention it is kind of ugly and puts a crimp in the food supply (that's something to worry about).
That's why America is hit with tsunamis,Earthquakes,Volcanoes,Floods,Tornadoes and hurricanes cause of gay marriages
 
I agree 100% dog ....

As per usual with wacko leftist, if you don' agree wholly with their agenda, then you are a denier, a racist, a bigot, a homophobe or what ever negative label their pea brain can come up with ....

I believe most rational thinking Americans are concerned about pollution and are willing to take steps to limit it. But, as we all know, that is not what the global warming hoax is about .... I am interested in limiting pollution .... I could give a sh*t less about some marxist global wealth redistribution, packaged up in some BS global warming bill of goods that is sold to the sheeple!
it is interesting that the solution put forth for too much CO2 is not to reduce CO2 but rather fork over money. With Kyoto high CO2 countries were to give money to low CO2 countries with the money intended to modernize that country. The oxymoron being that this would have the effect of increasing their CO2 output. And this seems to make sense to the lefties who were ulset that we laughed off Kyoto participation.
 
nah, same sex marriage is more a plague of frogs thing. stay on topic steve.
Yea im on topic.. Why you think GOD is cursing America? Even Fred Phelps and others says so.


Russia obeys the bible. Why you think they don't get Tsunamis,Earthquakes,Volcanoes,Floods,Tornadoes and hurricanes?
 
Werbung:
Yea im on topic.. Why you think GOD is cursing America? Even Fred Phelps and others says so.

and Phelps and the anti science crowd are equally credible.

Oh, if anyone is interested in what science is really saying, here it is:

Sea ice extent for August 2013 averaged 6.09 million square kilometers (2.35 million square miles). This was 1.03 million square kilometers (398,000 square miles) below the 1981 to 2010 average for August, but well above the level recorded last year, which was the lowest September extent in the satellite record. Ice extent this August was similar to the years 2008 to 2010. These contrasts in ice extent from one year to the next highlight the year-to-year variability attending the overall, long-term decline in sea ice extent.

Extent in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas has dropped below average, after near average conditions in July. The only region with average extent is the East Siberian Sea.

You can put away your muck lucks.
 
Back
Top