US beef industry collapses

Stalin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,020
US beef processors are shedding jobs primarily because there are far fewer cattle available to slaughter.

Prolonged drought, sharply rising feed and input costs, pandemic-related supply chain shocks, and ongoing threats from pests and animal disease have driven cattle inventories to decades-low levels.

As a result, procurement costs have surged, margins have been squeezed, and facilities built for much higher volumes are operating far below their intended scale. Rather than absorb these costs, companies have responded by closing plants, cutting shifts, and consolidating operations to better match output with reduced livestock supply.


comrade stalin
moscow
 
Werbung:
US beef processors are shedding jobs primarily because there are far fewer cattle available to slaughter.

Prolonged drought, sharply rising feed and input costs, pandemic-related supply chain shocks, and ongoing threats from pests and animal disease have driven cattle inventories to decades-low levels.

As a result, procurement costs have surged, margins have been squeezed, and facilities built for much higher volumes are operating far below their intended scale. Rather than absorb these costs, companies have responded by closing plants, cutting shifts, and consolidating operations to better match output with reduced livestock supply.


comrade stalin
moscow
Leftist Democrats have long advocated changes in beef production due to irrational fears driven by fake global warming foolishness. They claim they are not trying to do away with beef, but they also claim cows cause real problems to the environment.


“Corporate meatpackers use their market power to trap producers in the factory farm system with terrible profit margins and unsustainable debt,” said New York Sen. Cory Booker, who introduced the legislation along with two House Democrats. “This legislation leverages conservation funding to give farmers a completely voluntary new path forward by providing them with the resources they need to transition to a more climate-friendly and humane production system.”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


El metano y su incidencia en el cambio climático

Cattle contribute materially to global warming
Cattle contribute materially to global warming primarily through enteric methane and manure-related emissions, and multiple analyses quantify livestock as a major source of anthropogenic methane that accelerates near-term warming.

1769335102496.webp

1769335120831.webp

1769335146460.webp

1769335167257.webp
 
It is to your great discredit that threats to civilisation are subjects for your feeble amusement..

As is now common with deluded maga apparatchiks, ignorance and mindless tribal loyalty win over reality every time...

"..Methane (CH4) is the second most important greenhouse gas. CH4 is more potent than CO2 because the radiative forcing produced per molecule is greater. In addition, the infrared window is less saturated in the range of wavelengths of radiation absorbed by CH4, so more molecules may fill in the region. However, CH4 exists in far lower concentrations than CO2 in the atmosphere, and its concentrations by volume in the atmosphere are generally measured in parts per billion (ppb) rather than ppm. CH4 also has a considerably shorter residence time in the atmosphere than CO2 (the residence time for CH4 is roughly 10 years, compared with hundreds of years for CO2).

Natural sources of methane include tropical and northern wetlands, methane-oxidizing bacteria that feed on organic material consumed by termites, volcanoes, seepage vents of the seafloor in regions rich with organic sediment, and methane hydrates trapped along the continental shelves of the oceans and in polar permafrost. The primary natural sink for methane is the atmosphere itself, as methane reacts readily with the hydroxyl radical (OH−) within the troposphere to form CO2 and water vapour (H2O). When CH4 reaches the stratosphere, it is destroyed. Another natural sink is soil, where methane is oxidized by bacteria.


As with CO2, human activity is increasing the CH4 concentration faster than it can be offset by natural sinks. Anthropogenic sources currently account for approximately 70 percent of total annual emissions, leading to substantial increases in concentration over time. The major anthropogenic sources of atmospheric CH4 are rice cultivation, livestock farming, the burning of coal and natural gas, the combustion of biomass, and the decomposition of organic matter in landfills. Future trends are particularly difficult to anticipate. This is in part due to an incomplete understanding of the climate feedbacks associated with CH4 emissions. In addition, as human populations grow, it is difficult to predict how possible changes in livestock raising, rice cultivation, and energy use will influence CH4 emissions.

It is believed that a sudden increase in the concentration of methane in the atmosphere was responsible for a warming event that raised average global temperatures by 4–8 °C (7.2–14.4 °F) over a few thousand years during the so-called Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM). This episode took place roughly 55 million years ago, and the rise in CH4 appears to have been related to a massive volcanic eruption that interacted with methane-containing flood deposits. As a result, large amounts of gaseous CH4 were injected into the atmosphere. It is difficult to know precisely how high these concentrations were or how long they persisted. At very high concentrations, residence times of CH4 in the atmosphere can become much greater than the nominal 10-year residence time that applies today. Nevertheless, it is likely that these concentrations reached several ppm during the PETM.


comrade stalin
moscow
 
Werbung:
It is to your great discredit that threats to civilisation are subjects for your feeble amusement..

As is now common with deluded maga apparatchiks, ignorance and mindless tribal loyalty win over reality every time...

"..Methane (CH4) is the second most important greenhouse gas. CH4 is more potent than CO2 because the radiative forcing produced per molecule is greater. In addition, the infrared window is less saturated in the range of wavelengths of radiation absorbed by CH4, so more molecules may fill in the region. However, CH4 exists in far lower concentrations than CO2 in the atmosphere, and its concentrations by volume in the atmosphere are generally measured in parts per billion (ppb) rather than ppm. CH4 also has a considerably shorter residence time in the atmosphere than CO2 (the residence time for CH4 is roughly 10 years, compared with hundreds of years for CO2).

Natural sources of methane include tropical and northern wetlands, methane-oxidizing bacteria that feed on organic material consumed by termites, volcanoes, seepage vents of the seafloor in regions rich with organic sediment, and methane hydrates trapped along the continental shelves of the oceans and in polar permafrost. The primary natural sink for methane is the atmosphere itself, as methane reacts readily with the hydroxyl radical (OH−) within the troposphere to form CO2 and water vapour (H2O). When CH4 reaches the stratosphere, it is destroyed. Another natural sink is soil, where methane is oxidized by bacteria.


As with CO2, human activity is increasing the CH4 concentration faster than it can be offset by natural sinks. Anthropogenic sources currently account for approximately 70 percent of total annual emissions, leading to substantial increases in concentration over time. The major anthropogenic sources of atmospheric CH4 are rice cultivation, livestock farming, the burning of coal and natural gas, the combustion of biomass, and the decomposition of organic matter in landfills. Future trends are particularly difficult to anticipate. This is in part due to an incomplete understanding of the climate feedbacks associated with CH4 emissions. In addition, as human populations grow, it is difficult to predict how possible changes in livestock raising, rice cultivation, and energy use will influence CH4 emissions.

It is believed that a sudden increase in the concentration of methane in the atmosphere was responsible for a warming event that raised average global temperatures by 4–8 °C (7.2–14.4 °F) over a few thousand years during the so-called Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM). This episode took place roughly 55 million years ago, and the rise in CH4 appears to have been related to a massive volcanic eruption that interacted with methane-containing flood deposits. As a result, large amounts of gaseous CH4 were injected into the atmosphere. It is difficult to know precisely how high these concentrations were or how long they persisted. At very high concentrations, residence times of CH4 in the atmosphere can become much greater than the nominal 10-year residence time that applies today. Nevertheless, it is likely that these concentrations reached several ppm during the PETM.


comrade stalin
moscow
Since we have seen so much made-up facts and figures from so many less than honest public spokespeople, how can we trust them to know whether or not atmospheric methane levels have risen, fallen, or remained relatively unchanged since the beginning?

Atmospheric concentrations of methane are now more than 2.6 times higher than in pre-industrial times – the highest they’ve been in at least 800,000 years. Methane emission rates continue to rise along the most extreme trajectory used in emission scenarios by the world’s leading …
 
Back
Top