Reply to thread

Cyber Ninjas did conduct an investigation, but looting leftists misrepresent the facts and omit key details that show serious errors or fraud that were uncovered by the investigators of the 2020 election.

Maricopa County Forensic Audit Results – US 2020 Election Fraud at a Glance (electionfraud20.org)

10-25-21

US 2020 Election Fraud at a Glance

Reports by State › Arizona ›Maricopa County Forensic Audit ›

Maricopa County Forensic Audit Results

On Sep 24, 2021, the Arizona Senate heard presentations from the key auditors, presenting their findings.

The audit report identifies more than 57K questionable votes, intentionally deleted election files, and other suspicious voting machine activity. 1

The official written reports can be obtained from The Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus, or we’ve included direct links below.

Major issues identified:

• 255,326 early votes are recorded in the VM55 file of counted ballots but are missing from the EV33 file 2
• 17,322 duplicate votes (where voters sent in 2 or more ballots) that were illegally counted in the final certified tally (a large surge of these were dated the week following the election) 3
• 27,807 ballots cast from individuals who had moved prior to the election, and are unlikely to have physically received their ballots legally
• Envelopes without signatures that were stamped as “approved”
• Ballot envelopes showing an apparent “approved” stamp behind the basic graphics of the envelope, suggesting tampering, or at the very least, poor quality scanning and archival of envelope images
• The systems related to elections integrity had numbers that could not balance or agree with each other
• The voter rolls and the registration management process itself having many data integrity issues. For instance, over 200 individuals were easily identifiable as likely being the same person but having two different Voter IDs and voting twice in the election.
• Without access to the County’s detailed records including personally identifiable information and registration systems it is more likely there were many tens of thousands of improper votes in the election from double voters, deceased voters, voters for which there is no trace in the public records nor association to their voting address
• Proper voter registration law and procedures were not followed
• There were unexplained large purges of registered voters, right after the election, of people who had voted in the election
• There was back-dating of registrations, adjustments made to historical voting and voter records, unexplained linking of voter registration affidavits to multiple voters and more
• Files were missing from the Election Management System (EMS) Server and other voting machines, either intentionally or negligently removed
• Ballot images on the EMS were corrupt or missing
• Logs appeared to have been intentionally overwritten
• All data in one database related to the 2020 General Election had been fully wiped. This occurred on the day prior to Maricopa’s own internal audit. 4
• On the ballot side, batches were not always clearly delineated, duplicated ballots were missing the required serial numbers, some originals were duplicated more than once, and the auditors were never provided chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots for the time-period prior to the ballot’s movement into the auditors’ care. This all increased the complexity and difficulty in properly auditing the results.
• There were significant anomalies identified in the ratio of hand-folded ballots, on-demand printed ballots, and a significant increase in provisional ballot rejections for a mail-in ballot already being cast, suggestive of mail-in ballots being cast for voters without their knowledge.
• Maricopa County failed to follow basic cyber security best practices and guidelines from CISA 5
• Remote Access and “Terminal Services” features of Windows were enabled allowing machines to be remotely controlled 5
• Software and patch protocols were not followed 5
• Credential management was flawed: unique usernames and passwords were not allocated. Many (if not all) accounts shared the same password, and multiple users appear to have shared the same account. 5
• A dual-boot configuration was discovered on adjudication equipment which is not an approved configuration. The second hard drive contained non-Maricopa County data.