Is that a question? No, they are not lies -- they are standard history.
Correct. As I recall, it was the combined armies of syria, lebanon, egypt, jordan and iraq who made a military incursion in palestine a few days after the declaration.
Therefore, the aggressors were the countries named.
No. I didn't say irgun was legitimate. It was a para-military group whose formation was necessary when an entire ethnic group was faced with lawless violence -- something that the british administrators of the palestinian mandate was incapable (or simply neglected) to deter.
You have your constitutional right to bear arms, do you not?
What is this nonsense??? It is tit for tat. Rape and massacre were the specialty of the palestinian arabs back then.
Prior to 1948, arabs were the majority ethnic group in the palestinian mandate. Jews trickled in the mandate trying to escape the holocaust. The reason british position became untenable and prompting their withdrawal from the mandate is because the lawless violence perpetrated by the arab majority was widespread and beyond placating. And since the jews were suddenly willing to fight back, they saw the situation would spiral out of control -- as it certainly did.
Ethnically cleansed? Your opinions don't even abide by simple logic. How can a small minority 'ethnically cleanse' a territory as large as the palestinian mandate from its overwhelming arab majority, eh? A fledling state that didn't even have enough time to put together a functioning government apparatus and surrounded by hostile arab nations, were guilty of ethnic cleansing, eh?
What nonsense.
Good. I will do so until you are capable of using some logic in that bigoted skull of yours.
