Not all americans, but some really are beyond any hope of redemption.
You are correct, though. It is in the interest of the us to be able to project military and economic presence throughout the world. That is why you spend big -- to be able to get even bigger. Its simple logic really -- one that is quantifiable by basic long-term cost-benefit analysis.
What is quite naive, actually, is your opinion that your government is spending all that out of the goodness of your collective hearts.
Duh?
LOL.
Again -- you need not note what I'm saying because -- guess what???? -- they are all matters of actual fact. They are standard history.
Did they massacre arabs? It certainly isn't beyond the scope of what para-military organizations do -- a bit of tit for their tat. Did they forcibly expel arabs? They most likely did in some cases. When you conduct a defensive war, some places otherwise populated by civilians would gain military strategic importance. You draw battle and supply lines on a map, and whether these lines traverse populated areas or not is irrelevant to military goals. The majority simply fled so as not to interfere in what they thought would be an extermination.
But the FACTS still remain -- all were not only necessary but crucial, TO THEIR EXISTENCE AS A SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT NATION.
LOL.
Who exactly would be inclined to believe your silly accusations when you are willing to overlook the immense cost in human life of TWO NUCLEAR ATTACKS, eh?
You see, I am educated in an american established educational institution. I lived all my life believing your country is a benevolent world leader. If I have any biased bone in my body, it would be skewed towards your country.
Whatever bias I may have is irrelevant to the FACT, you dropped atomic bombs in hiroshima and nagasaki for the purpose of ending ww2 as quickly as possible. These cities did not have any strategic military importance -- it was purely psychological. The message was explicit -- continue the war or face annihilation.
