Reply to thread

Polygamy, homosexuality, heterosexuality, are all simply sexual preferences.  It has nothing to do with politics, except for the fact that libs make the sexual issues important to them political.   It should simply follow that if someone loves someone that they should be able to love them openly.  Isn't that the lib mantra?  The assumption that polygamy must involve child molestation is pretty general, and probably as erroneous.  Wow, a couple of girls didn't like being married off.  That certainly sums up an entire population.


Of course it doesn't seem to bother libs that teenage girls seem to get pregnant and have children at the same age as the girls libs are assuming are being "molested". I guess the real argument is that polygamists do their thing under the guise of religion, instead of flat out sluttiness.  Is that what bothers libs?  The REASON and not the result?


The "my baby daddy" mentality doesn't seem to bother libs either. who's certain that none of those unwed mothers weren't impregnated by someone much older?  Why is a thirteen year old girl who gets pregnant by someone who knows she won't marry or support her O.K.?It's these kind of assumptions that have caused homosexual love to be critized for so long. I guess it's O.K. for libs to categorize people.  Why is that?


The real question is:  Which political party in this country gets to define morality and why?


Back
Top