Reply to thread

Is it your contention that the laws passed against gay people were promulgated and passed by liberals?  The laws about child molestation were passed by liberals? Can you support that positon? 



Only if they are consenting adults, I don't know anyone who advocates allowing child/adult sex to be legalized.  Do you?



The last group that was in court for this had its first member convicted under US law.  No one said that the others would be found guilty nor implied that all polygamists marry underage girls--just the only group that is currently in court is accused of that.  I am fine with polygamy involving consenting adults just like they had in the Bible.  How about you?



Got a real "lib" hardon don't you?  Individual underage girls getting pregnant is their choice, underage girls being required to marry older men against their will is a whole different ball game.  And just because some girls do dumb stuff doesn't mean that it should be legal for others to force unwilling girls to do likewise.  



So what you are arguing is that if some people do something stupid, that it should be legal to force others to do the same thing?  Sluttiness is a personal choice rather than a legally sanctioned activity.  Can you see the differece?



What's your point?  Because some girls MAY get impregnated by older men that we should make forced marriages between young girls and older men legal?



Who, besides you, has said it's okay?  I don't think it's okay, I support sex ed, abstinence programs, and whatever else we can do to prevent teen motherhood.  What makes you think I don't?



What assumptions are you refering to?  Libs are the ones attacking homosexuals?  Hello, what planet do you live on?  F'ing nutcase Bible-beaters are the ones attacking gays.



It must be because you have done it with amazing inaccuracy in your post. Almost nothing you posted was true.



Why should any political party be able to define morality?  Is there some edict from God that says we have to enforce morality with the laws of some political party?


Beyond outlawing coercion, I see no need to enforce morality at all.


Back
Top