Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Historical revisionism isn't reserved to just Mare I see. ASPCA, if you scroll back through this thread you will see that Mare himself started the ball rolling by accusing that I had latent hatred for gays because he misquoted my statements from the Prop 8 thread about a man I loved [but never had sex with nor wanted to] who died from AIDS some years back. Mare attempted to browbeat me with that stunt. So since he himself initiated recollections of that thread, I followed suit. Do your homework before you assume I was the one who started the references to the prop 8 thread.I notice a plethora of very defensive posts from Mare...as expected. So far I see nothing from him that defies my theory that he is operating purely from a common-denial mechanism. Predictably he attacks, accuses others of sex with animals. In fact he seems preoccupied with sex and if you mention anything to do with any type of friendship or affinity to people or of animals he immediately retorts/assumes that you want to have sex with them? Curious way to filter the world there Mare. It's why I keep saying that sex isn't love, nor is it friendship, nor is it affinity. And why you should probably see a psychiatrist who is good with defensive issues.It's important to remember to those reading this post and others that I would not be so completely and starkly confrontational with a poster as fragile as Mare is [obviously]. And so ASPCA's concerns are coming from his/her heart. The problem is that people like Mare want us to buy into their fragile mental state and make it normal for kids to aspire to [implied]. It is at this point that I stand up and begin direct confrontation to what should probably be better handled on a psychiatrist's couch and with a gentle hand. [no Mare, I'm not talking about a hand job].
Historical revisionism isn't reserved to just Mare I see. ASPCA, if you scroll back through this thread you will see that Mare himself started the ball rolling by accusing that I had latent hatred for gays because he misquoted my statements from the Prop 8 thread about a man I loved [but never had sex with nor wanted to] who died from AIDS some years back. Mare attempted to browbeat me with that stunt. So since he himself initiated recollections of that thread, I followed suit. Do your homework before you assume I was the one who started the references to the prop 8 thread.
I notice a plethora of very defensive posts from Mare...as expected. So far I see nothing from him that defies my theory that he is operating purely from a common-denial mechanism. Predictably he attacks, accuses others of sex with animals. In fact he seems preoccupied with sex and if you mention anything to do with any type of friendship or affinity to people or of animals he immediately retorts/assumes that you want to have sex with them? Curious way to filter the world there Mare. It's why I keep saying that sex isn't love, nor is it friendship, nor is it affinity. And why you should probably see a psychiatrist who is good with defensive issues.
It's important to remember to those reading this post and others that I would not be so completely and starkly confrontational with a poster as fragile as Mare is [obviously]. And so ASPCA's concerns are coming from his/her heart. The problem is that people like Mare want us to buy into their fragile mental state and make it normal for kids to aspire to [implied]. It is at this point that I stand up and begin direct confrontation to what should probably be better handled on a psychiatrist's couch and with a gentle hand. [no Mare, I'm not talking about a hand job].
