Reply to thread

Re: What if JFK assassination was differant?




You almost completely ignored the evidence presented and then you say how do you know it's a gun if there's white and grey over it? I know it's a gun because all the evidence points to Greer shooting jfk and being able to easily prove Zfilm alteration. If you would actually read my posts you would see that I proved Greer's guilt beyond all doubt. See, for you to pose a challenge you must raise some doubt which you have not nor will you ever. You have doubt on my conclusion, and thus you have not provided any plausible, alternate explanations. Simply provide an explanation for why Greer is passing anything and why do you think Groden and Marrs lied about this for decades? They lied because it's half the proof that Greer was the assassin. The other half's in the Nix film which has been exposed.


I can identify the gun because I can see the covered gun he's passing. So, you cannot prove there is NOT a gun or why he's passsing anything?


Secondly, and yet again most importantly, the fact that Greer had a gun is not part of the official story, therefore more proof of cover-up. I have not assumed anything but have proven the reflection on Roy's head fake on its own and showed the reason for its addition to Z by showing his arm cross in Nix. I have provided overwhelming evidence of film alteration and tons of corroborative work. Your silly challenge is that you can't see the gun because something is placed over it...that would be laughed at by juries, judges and any open minded person who has no stake in denying this obvious truth.


The gun was covered and bleached out. I have a bleached object that was covered during alteration.I have three films that are legible which prove Greer's movements were responsible for the headshot and his angle to Kennedy lines up perfectly with the right rear exit.


The gun was covered and bleached out. So again, I have a gun and you have posed no challenge for why an object was covered before and after the shot with three fake reflections that perfectly mirror a cartoon gun, hand and arm at the moment of the headshot. You have no evidence or challenge of anything because you are old hat. The past is gone in the jfk case. The present and future is the obvious fact that Greer shot Kennedy.


Lastly, the demand of impossible proof is requiring to show the uncovered gun which I cannot because it was covered during alteration with white and grey, but, its ignored and covered up existence is all the proof any prosecutor would need.


Back
Top