You have no argument..you have name calling and the opinions of others and that is about all you have.
Then clearly you never trained a working dog...a dog that actually earns her keep....when you take on that task, it is because that is just about all you want to do. There is little time for anything else for about the first 8 or 9 months. I suppose you think teaching a dog to sit and roll over and not crap on the carpet is training. Good for you.
Like I said...I have been waiting for you to name a racist policy from either trump or the republicans. To date, you haven't managed to provide anything. In your post truth, alternate facts existence, I don't guess that the fact that words have meanings really sinks in...or means much to you. The word racist has a specific meaning..it isn't just a word whiners use to shut down arguments. Here, let me help you out.
Dictionary.com - Racism - a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.
Webster - Racism - a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
The Free Dictionary - Racism - The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
Cambridge Dictionary - Racism - The belief that some races are better than others, or the unfair treatmentof someone because of his or her race
Oxford -Racism- Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
So it seems that dictionaries across the board pretty much agree on the definition of racism and there is no specific definition for the term in the legal dictionaries so the courts must rely on the same definition as the rest of us. Trump put a ban on immigrants and refugees from 7 countries. The predominant race of those 7 countries is arab if you care to call arab a race. He did not put a ban on arabs, nor did he put a ban on any arabs from 4o some odd other countries whose predominant race is arab....further, the executive order was informed by policy put in place by obama.
Were it a racist policy, it would be in place against all middle easterners rather than middle easterners from 7 specific countries...hell, if it were against muslims, it still would not be racism, it might be religious discrimination..business as usual for liberals for decades, but not racism.
Here is the order...using the actual definition of racism rather than some made up definition in accordance with your alt.reality existence, point out the racism contained therein.
[T]o ensure the proper review and maximum utilization of available resources for the screening of foreign nationals, and to ensure that adequate standards are established to prevent infiltration by foreign terrorists or criminals, pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens from countries referred to in section 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12), would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, of such persons for 90 days from the date of this order (excluding those foreign nationals traveling on diplomatic visas, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visas, C-2 visas for travel to the United Nations, and G-1, G-2, G-3, and G-4 visas). . . .
[T]he Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may, on a case-by-case basis, and when in the national interest, issue visas or other immigration benefits to nationals of countries for which visas and benefits are otherwise blocked.
Crying racism when none is present is just typical liberal name calling in an effort to avoid the actual issue. It has been the game plan of liberals for decades.
And to claim that it must be true because a court said so is to assume that the courts are infallible. The definition of the word is what it is...it means a certain thing and clearly his ban on immigrants and refugees from those 7 countries while still allowing people of the same race to immigrate from roughly 40 other countries precludes the whining, hysterical cry of racism.
Democrats are still gerrymandering in states where they hold the majority...are they racist also? You aren't pissed about gerrymandering, you are pissed because republicans have better success with it than democrats.
So I am still waiting for you to provide any policy by trump or republicans that is racist in nature.
https://www.houseofpolitics.com/threads/modern-liberalism-authoritarianism.1879/ There you go as if it were hard to find.
A simple search for threads started buy me would have placed the thread in position 12. Not hard for a thinking person but clearly difficult for you.