First of all, throw out every single UNGA Resolution, because those have no authority under the law.
Outside of that, you have cited UNSC 242, 446, and 1937. However, you have ignored the clear language in them all.
UNSC 242 expressly calls for the need of the states to live in security, and only calls for a withdrawal "from territories", that is not an indication of "all territories, or anything really, just that some withdrawal from some area should occur, given security is not challenged. With this idea, Israel has already withdrawn from tons of the land, meeting any legal requirement they had under this UNSC.
UNSC 446 is full of many of the same problems, it offers no actual punishment, and the US abstained, rendering it all but meaningless except on paper. Additionally, the Oslo Accords all but leave the settlements until a later date, leaving open the argument that the settlements are only temporary, as agreed to by Oslo. And the settlements do not violate the Geneva Conventions, which is what this resolution is mostly focusing on.
UNSC 1937 simply "affirms a vision"... that is not a roadmap to the vision, it is simply "we all think this should happen one day."
At best, settlements are disputed, not illegal.
