Reply to thread

Well yes possibly they did, that is of course entirely conceivable, apart from obtaining DNA from paper products, not sure if that would be very probable.


But Rob and this is rather important, if the intelligence services did actually obtain DNA control samples from the hijackers at some point before 9/11, with which to later use as control samples as you hypothesise here, then they, I am sure you would agree, must have had a very strong reason at the time for doing so.


This hypothesis, in which Intel services surreptitiously collected control samples  from the hijackers would also strongly indicate that the hijackers were being very closely monitored, why?


For intel services to do this, there would have to be very strong reasoning behind it, as we both know Intel services do not randomly go about collecting DNA control samples from the public at large (or they certainly didn't before Sept 11).


This in itself, if yours and Gensenca's hypotheses are correct, raises other very important questions that remain unanswered and seems to me highly improbable, when one considers that FBI Director Robert Mueller declared that “there were no warning signs that I’m aware of", re: 9/11.


Eleanor Hill, staff director for the House and Senate intelligence committees inquiry into intelligence failures leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks also said her investigation had found nothing to indicate that U.S. authorities had any previous information about the 19 hijackers.


Back
Top