Reply to thread

You 9/11 conspiratorial lot are great for comedy,  but a failure in logic.   I don't trust the bushy explanation of the whole ordeal, simply because they're pretty lackluster in the department of following through with good report,  however I don't think it's some conspiracy.    All the "proof"  is easily negated and contextually it may make sense,  but science derides many of the arguments,  such as "fuel doesn't burn hot enough blah blah blah"  but then they're not taking into account the rapid oxidation of metals and as well as structural embrittlement of steel/iron through aging and exposure to chemicals.     (pour some mercury in a cola can and watch what happens,  this also occurs with many natural compounds and post-mfg chemicals coming from materials manufacture)   All the tests done on the materials by so called conspiracy theorists are considering simply new steel support beams,  and weight that do not reflect the real world applications.   please stop with this drivel until you have some REAL evidence... not some big footesque photos and contextually out of sort defined images of pieces of planes.


Back
Top