As I said before, all of that has been addressed before, and you're just simply wrong.
You claim there was no wreckage, but the pictures are there, showing wreckage all over the place, while firefighters battled the blaze, so for what purpose do you insist that there was no wreckage? What possible gain is there for you to insist that what everyone has seen with their own eyes does not exist?
As for comparing the two buildings, and questioning the differences in damage, they were of two completely different types of construction. Would you expect a modern wood frame house to react the same as an old brick Brownstone to an earthquake, or for that matter a hurricane? The wood frame house will likely survive an earthquake with very little structural damage, that would utterly destroy a Brownstone, yet the Brownstone will survive a hurricane far easier than a wood frame house. Simply put, you're comparing apples and pumpkins, which still begs the question,...why?
You yourself have supplied the answer, your rabid and illogical hatred of President Bush, so you invent and propogate any and every slander against him, regardless of the truth, and that sir, makes you one very sad individual. If you are incapable of engaging in an honest evaluation of the man, giving credit where it is due, and honest criticism where it is due, then nothing you say is of any value to anyone, least of all yourself.
