Roker, I understand where you're coming from, feeling that the NYPD officer's recounting of the events concerning him, from his perspective, is not a conspiracy theory because it's just his account with no indication of being in conclusion with anyone else.
The problem is that no, he's not a part of a conspiracy theory, but his claims and observations, assessments and conclusions are part of the general "9/11 Conspiracy Theories" category. With his presentation he is implying and at points accusing others as perpetuating the days events in a diabolical manner, that two or more were conspiring to have those events unfold.
No one is saying that he's part of a conspiracy. What is true, though, is that he's presenting, or alluding to, the theory part of the phrase. The phrase is actually two components from both ends of the issue.
Believe me, I'm in no way blindly supporting the government, from Congress, to the President, to the Supreme Court. If any type of solid evidence ever emerges that there was any type of American (PERIOD!) manipulation on 9/11 events, I'll be the first to light a torch and storm Washington. (Or wherever the American involvement could stem from...)
