Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

I never said that 9/11 wasn't important. I siad that getting into a 3 day argument over what forum it belongs in isn't important.

So? What does this prove? None of these people have been able to refute the flawless logic.

They are nutjobs. I mean, it's one thing to say that the government bureaucracies failed miserably to prevent this attack and they should be criticized very heavily for this, but to honestly think that the government had anything to do with it defies all logic.

I'm not really interested in starting the my scientist vs. your scientist stuff, but anyone who steps back and assesses this objectively can clearly discern that there is no grand conspiracy involving the Bush Administration.

Here's a question: How is a president willing (and able) to bring down the World Trade Center, murdering nearly 3,000 Americans without inspiring a single whistle-blower or attracting a solitary eyewitness, somehow morally or logistically incapable of planting some exculpatory WMDs in Iraq?

Do you really think the Bush Administration is competent enough to pull this off and secretive enough to have it not leak?

<blockquote data-quote="USMC the Almighty" data-source="post: 19341" data-attributes="member: 128">I never said that 9/11 wasn&#039;t important. I siad that getting into a 3 day argument over what forum it belongs in isn&#039;t important. So? What does this prove? None of these people have been able to refute the flawless logic.They are nutjobs. I mean, it&#039;s one thing to say that the government bureaucracies failed miserably to prevent this attack and they should be criticized very heavily for this, but to honestly think that the government had anything to do with it defies all logic. I&#039;m not really interested in starting the my scientist vs. your scientist stuff, but anyone who steps back and assesses this objectively can clearly discern that there is no grand conspiracy involving the Bush Administration. Here&#039;s a question: How is a president willing (and able) to bring down the World Trade Center, murdering nearly 3,000 Americans without inspiring a single whistle-blower or attracting a solitary eyewitness, somehow morally or logistically incapable of planting some exculpatory WMDs in Iraq?Do you really think the Bush Administration is competent enough to pull this off and secretive enough to have it not leak?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="USMC the Almighty, post: 19341, member: 128"] I never said that 9/11 wasn't important. I siad that getting into a 3 day argument over what forum it belongs in isn't important. So? What does this prove? None of these people have been able to refute the flawless logic. They are nutjobs. I mean, it's one thing to say that the government bureaucracies failed miserably to prevent this attack and they should be criticized very heavily for this, but to honestly think that the government had anything to do with it defies all logic. I'm not really interested in starting the my scientist vs. your scientist stuff, but anyone who steps back and assesses this objectively can clearly discern that there is no grand conspiracy involving the Bush Administration. Here's a question: How is a president willing (and able) to bring down the World Trade Center, murdering nearly 3,000 Americans without inspiring a single whistle-blower or attracting a solitary eyewitness, somehow morally or logistically incapable of planting some exculpatory WMDs in Iraq? Do you really think the Bush Administration is competent enough to pull this off and secretive enough to have it not leak? [/QUOTE]

Verification