Reply to thread

note how you continue to bring up the defenition of "conspiracy theory" from merriam webster?

Also note how you COMPLETLY AVOIDED my direct responses to your ludicrous definitions....

there can be NO "CONSPIRACY THEORY" as the BURDEN of conspiracy has not been met

BTW i use merriam websters definition of conspiracy....... its all listed several posts ahead of this

you were UNABLE to counter my points instead, you ignored them and waited and tried your tack again.......

your really not as hot as id thought .......your rather ineffective actually

the more i actually watch and read what you post the more apparent it becomes.............

there is NO CONSPIRACY in this mans SINGULAR accounts of that day the BURDEN of conspiracy per merriam websters hasnt been met there fore your "conspiracy theory" defenitions as i stated much earlier in the thread are NULL and VOID