Reply to thread

I'm denied lots of things for other reasons - that's the point.  You said "it is a legal contract in US law and therefore should be available to all citizens" as if mere citizenship qualified anyone for any contract - clearly a false statement.




Saint Bacchus??? :D  Did they have wine at the reception? :p  So that's your proof that " gay marriages have been widely recognized throughout history in many cultures. "?  




"Normal" and "variant" describing the same thing is a self-contradiction - you should read a book on statistics.  And I personally am not even necessarily arguing that homosexuality isn't "normal" - I said homosexuals are attempting the hijack it because they want to force the "normality" perception on people who don't believe it.




You are proposing the change - you should come up with a convincing reason WHY it's needed.  Otherwise it's merely an issue for the voters at the polls, who in liberal california have turned it down twice, inspite of leftwingers trying their usual end-run around democracy by shopping for the right leftwing judge who will give it to them anyway.


 


HA HA HA! :D  Uh, noooooooo, it's not an emotional issue for me - it's just a bullshiit issue which has been repeatedly squashed at the polls and in the courts.  It's more like a pesky mosquito that keeps coming back for another swat. :)


Back
Top