Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

Not true at all...

Criminals don't "agree" to laws either. If they did they wouldn't break them. The baby rapist or serial murderer doesn't "agree" with laws. They just do what they want. And we don't torture them.

You need to remember one thing when you get too wound up with "anything goes with terrorists". There was a time in the American Revolution that much of the world looked at us as the terrorists. We didn't line up in open fields and use marksmanship to win battles as was the norm of the day because we were out skilled and out numbered. We started employing so called Indian fighting. Ambushing and shooting from behind rocks & trees.

I'm not saying this to justify terrorism in anyway. I'm just saying that the definition is often dictated by the winner. One sides terrorist is the other sides Freedom Fighter or Patriot.

We don't need to nor should we employ terrorism to beat terrorism. We will win in an honorable way because we are Americans and that stands for something!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQWCAVzM384

<blockquote data-quote="top gun" data-source="post: 51906" data-attributes="member: 428">Not true at all... Criminals don&#039;t &quot;agree&quot; to laws either. If they did they wouldn&#039;t break them. The baby rapist or serial murderer doesn&#039;t &quot;agree&quot; with laws. They just do what they want. And we don&#039;t torture them.You need to remember one thing when you get too wound up with &quot;anything goes with terrorists&quot;. There was a time in the American Revolution that much of the world looked at us as the terrorists. We didn&#039;t line up in open fields and use marksmanship to win battles as was the norm of the day because we were out skilled and out numbered. We started employing so called Indian fighting. Ambushing and shooting from behind rocks &amp; trees. I&#039;m not saying this to justify terrorism in anyway. I&#039;m just saying that the definition is often dictated by the winner. One sides terrorist is the other sides Freedom Fighter or Patriot. We don&#039;t need to nor should we employ terrorism to beat terrorism. We will win in an honorable way because we are Americans and that stands for something! <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQWCAVzM384" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQWCAVzM384</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="top gun, post: 51906, member: 428"] [COLOR="DarkRed"][B]Not true at all... [/B] Criminals don't "agree" to laws either. If they did they wouldn't break them. The baby rapist or serial murderer doesn't "agree" with laws. They just do what they want. And we don't torture them. You need to remember one thing when you get too wound up with "anything goes with terrorists". There was a time in the American Revolution that much of the world looked at us as the terrorists. We didn't line up in open fields and use marksmanship to win battles as was the norm of the day because we were out skilled and out numbered. We started employing so called Indian fighting. Ambushing and shooting from behind rocks & trees. I'm not saying this to justify terrorism in anyway. I'm just saying that the definition is often dictated by the winner. One sides terrorist is the other sides Freedom Fighter or Patriot. [B]We don't need to nor should we employ terrorism to beat terrorism. We will win in an honorable way because we are Americans and that stands for something! [/B][/COLOR] [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQWCAVzM384[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification