Why the media is not whining about Kennedy brushing them off

XCALIDEM

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
1,052
There was huge uproar from the media when Sarah Palin was being kept away from being asked question that could her into trouble. We all remember the ABC and CBS interviews in which she was asked dumb questions and she prefered no to answer them.

Here is poor little Caroline Kennedy who refuses to talk to the media. Who is surrounded by handlers who have asked the media to e-mail their questions before they can be answered. Yet, hardly anyone is making it a huge deal about it......



Amazing: :mad:

http://www.foxnews.com/video-search/m/21705432/sarah_palin_ized.htm?pageid=37001


The daughter of the assassinated President John F. Kennedy is widely seen as the front runner to be named by Governor David Paterson of New York to the US Senate once Mrs Clinton is confirmed as the new US secretary of state and vacates her seat.

Never elected and with no real political experience, Miss Kennedy, 51, has been panned by Republicans and some Democrats for what they see as her dynastic ambitions and sense of entitlement.

Her reluctance to sit for interviews or face press questions has drawn unfavourable comparisons with Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska, who was kept away from the media for much of her vice-presidential campaign.

Miss Kennedy declined to supply the New York Times with a variety of basic data, including companies she had a stake in and whether she had ever faced a criminal charge.

A spokesman told the newspaper that she would only release such information once she had become a senator.

"If Governor Paterson were to choose Caroline, she would, of course, comply with all disclosure requirements."

Applicants for a position in the Obama administration have to respond to 63 questions and disclose potentially embarrassing text messages, Facebook entries, blogs, the immigration status of household staff and every curriculum vitae used in the past 10 years.

Those running for election to the Senate have to fill in a publicly available report on financial assets, mortgages, credit card debts, book deals and the sources of any payments greater than $5,000 over the previous three years.

Her uncle Senator Ted Kennedy - who inherited his brother's seat after he became president - has disclosed that his net worth is more than $40 million.

At the weekend, Representative Gary Ackerman, who had previously compared Miss Kennedy to the singer Jennifer Lopez, was scornful of her candidacy.

"Everyone knows who she is, but I'm not sure what she is," he told CBS News. "Eventually she has to get in the ring and face the public. DNA in this business can take you just so far."

He joked: "Rembrandt was a great artist. His brother Murray, on the other hand, Murray Rembrandt, wouldn't paint a house."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ine-Kennedy-refuses-to-disclose-finances.html
 
Werbung:
Faux News?..Oh, that's right..you're a Republican.

Sorry but compared to the refined well educated Carline Kennedy, Sarah Palin is an ignorant hillbilly.
 
Faux News?..Oh, that's right..you're a Republican.

Sorry but compared to the refined well educated Carline Kennedy, Sarah Palin is an ignorant hillbilly.

What public office has she hold??? NONE!!!!

Analysis: No clear path for Kennedy
By Reid Wilson
Posted: 12/22/08 04:56 PM [ET]
Caroline Kennedy has garnered heavy media attention in her bid to fill Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) Senate seat, but the scion of America’s best-known political family has anything but a clear path to Washington.

Kennedy, the daughter of the late President Kennedy and an ally of President-elect Obama, will likely compete with a rising star with one of the best last names in New York politics and a slew of other potential candidates ready to make their case to Gov. David Paterson.

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, the son of Gov. Mario Cuomo, is said to be interested in the job and has his own allies quietly lobbying for his appointment. Complicating the rivalry for the seat is a personal tension between families derived from Cuomo’s very public divorce from Kennedy's cousin.

Paterson could avoid stepping between the two powerful families by appointing someone else. Reps. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.), Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) are said to be on Paterson's short list, as is Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown (D).

Several Empire State Democrats looking to take Kennedy down a peg and elevate their own candidacies have openly questioned her credentials of late. Some go so far as to suggest that appointing Kennedy to the Senate could even give Republicans a better shot at capturing the seat in two years.

On CBS’s “Face the Nation” this weekend, Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-N.Y.) compared Kennedy's recent trip to upstate New York with Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's (R) rollout as the GOP vice presidential nominee. Former Rep. Geraldine Ferraro (D-N.Y.) wrote Paterson urging him not to appoint Kennedy to the seat.

Both are seen as allies of Maloney, the nine-term Manhattan congresswoman who, on a radio station Monday morning, defended Ackerman as a champion of women's rights. Ackerman’s complaints about Kennedy had led to charges he was being sexist.

Israel accrued hours of personal time over the weekend on a trip to Iraq with Paterson, who has sole authority over who will get Clinton’s seat. The Long Island congressman has been to the war zone several times, and aides say the governor, who wanted to make his first trip to the country, has been working on a trip with Israel and Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) since at least October.

Democrats critical of Kennedy have questioned her ability as a campaigner. Cuomo has run and won statewide races; Israel, Maloney, Gillibrand and Brown all know what a campaign entails. Facing the prospect of a tough battle in two years, potentially against Rep. Pete King (R-N.Y.), some Democrats wonder whether Kennedy would react well to the pressures of a Senate campaign.

Kennedy's public campaign for the seat has also drawn criticism as far too public for what is seen as an insider’s run. Though several candidates are actively seeking the appointment, none have held the sort of barnstorming events Kennedy has, especially during her trip upstate last week.

But Kennedy has promising allies, including several newspapers that have editorialized for her selection. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has reportedly called Paterson to urge him to pick Kennedy. And though Kennedy was a prominent Obama backer in the presidential primaries, Clinton herself reportedly has told allies not to stand in Kennedy’s way.

Those following the race have taken Cuomo’s unusual silence about the contest as evidence of his interest in the seat. Cuomo, son of former Gov. Mario Cuomo and President Clinton’s secretary of Housing and Urban Development, would bring a wealth of experience in both New York and Washington, backers say. The one-term attorney general has also expressed interest in running for the governor’s mansion, and an appointment by Paterson would eliminate a potential rival in 2010.

House Democrats have been impressed by Gillibrand’s ability to raise money and to win in a district that has historically leaned Republican. Still, with just two elections under her belt, Gillibrand may be young enough to survive being passed over and may consider a statewide run of her own in the future.

Brown is the most prominent African-American candidate still being widely mentioned for the job. Being from upstate is a positive for some Democrats, but when faced with a Republican opponent based closer to New York City — as King is — upstate Democrats have had less success. On the job for just three years, Brown is also young enough for Paterson to consider delaying his ascension.

Clinton has not said definitively when she will resign her Senate seat, though she has indicated she will hold the seat until confirmed as secretary of State.
 
There was huge uproar from the media when Sarah Palin was being kept away from being asked question that could her into trouble. We all remember the ABC and CBS interviews in which she was asked dumb questions and she prefered no to answer them.

Here is poor little Caroline Kennedy who refuses to talk to the media. Who is surrounded by handlers who have asked the media to e-mail their questions before they can be answered. Yet, hardly anyone is making it a huge deal about it......



Amazing: :mad:

http://www.foxnews.com/video-search/m/21705432/sarah_palin_ized.htm?pageid=37001



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ine-Kennedy-refuses-to-disclose-finances.html

Because she is a democrat. There will never be a day when democrat\liberals hold their own to the same standards they try and hold conservatives\republicans to.
 
yea cuz republicans are soooo fair :rolleyes:

I think in general when it comes to stuff like this yeah they are more fair but by no means saints.

NO republican would last through congress if they had the history of Ted Kennedy or Robert Byrd, there is just no way.

With all the sleazeball democrats out there they refuse to talk about them EVER! but they wont stop talking about Larry Craig and the funny thing is the republicans dont stop talking about him too. He made the top ten list for slime balls with Dennis Miller. Libs dont turn on thier own no matter how bad they need turning on, Republicans do.
 
It looks like the Kennedy brand is sellable after all... :D



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

December 24, 2008
Resistance to Kennedy Grows Among Democrats
By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE
ALBANY — Resistance is emerging among Democratic officials against Caroline Kennedy as she pursues Hillary Rodham Clinton’s seat in the United States Senate, with Gov. David A. Paterson bristling over suggestions that her selection is inevitable, according to his advisers, and other leading Democrats concerned that she is too beholden to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg.

The governor is frustrated and chagrined, the advisers said, because he believes that he extended Ms. Kennedy the chance to demonstrate her qualifications but that her operatives have exploited the opportunity to convey a sense that she is all but appointed already. He views this as an attempt to box him in, the advisers said.

“You have people going around saying, ‘Oh yeah, it’s a done deal,’ ” said one of the advisers, who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the selection process and did not want to anger the governor. “The quickest way to not get something you want is to step into somebody’s face.”

The governor’s frustration follows reports last week that Kevin Sheekey, a top deputy to Mr. Bloomberg who has been advising Ms. Kennedy, had called a labor leader and told him that Ms. Kennedy was going to be senator, “so get on board now,” and that a member of Senator Edward M. Kennedy’s staff was helping Ms. Kennedy reach out to unions.

It was not clear on Tuesday whether the governor’s reaction would seriously damage Ms. Kennedy’s chances to win the appointment or if it merely reflected Mr. Paterson’s desire to regain control of the selection process after Ms. Kennedy’s very public political debut.

But Ms. Kennedy’s ties to Mr. Bloomberg’s political team and her waffling over whether she would support a Democrat in next year’s mayoral race appear to be angering some Democrats. On Tuesday, Sheldon Silver, the Assembly speaker, became the most senior elected official in the state to say that that Mr. Paterson should not select Ms. Kennedy to the Senate seat.

“If I were the governor, I would look and question whether this is the appointment I would want to make, whether her first obligation might be to the mayor of the City of New York rather than the governor who would be appointing her," Mr. Silver said during an interview on WGDJ, an Albany radio station.

Mr. Silver has long had a testy relationship with Mr. Bloomberg, fueled by battles over mayoral initiatives like congestion pricing.

A spokeswoman for Ms. Kennedy declined to comment. Ms. Kennedy’s advisers, speaking anonymously because they did not want to inflame the situation further, rejected any suggestion that they had portrayed her selection as inevitable and insisted that they had been respectful of the governor’s desire for a decorous selection process.

The criticism over her bid has also frustrated those advisers, who feel that Ms. Kennedy has been whiplashed by assertions that she is at once protected and presumptuous.

Both the governor and Ms. Kennedy’s advisers appear to have been thrown, in part, by Ms. Kennedy’s overwhelming personal celebrity.

Ms. Kennedy made dozens of calls to elected officials and other leaders to build interest in her candidacy, and many of those with whom she spoke call her thoughtful and self-effacing.

But her refusal to say over the weekend whether she would back a Democratic candidate next year, when Mr. Bloomberg will seek re-election as an independent, set off intense reaction among some in the party.

A follow-up statement — in which her spokesman, Stefan Friedman, said that Ms. Kennedy “fully intends to support the Democratic nominee” — did not assuage those concerns.

Moreover, her ties to Mr. Bloomberg’s operatives have aroused suspicions among Democrats and labor officials that she would be beholden to the mayor. Ms. Kennedy hired the consulting firm Knickerbocker S.K.D., which includes Mr. Bloomberg as one of its biggest clients.

Those suspicions appeared to be compounded by a comment Mr. Bloomberg made on Monday defending Ms. Kennedy and suggesting that, though the choice was Mr. Paterson’s, the governor should move quickly to select a replacement for Mrs. Clinton, who is expected to be confirmed next month as secretary of state.

“We didn’t tell him to hurry up on term limits,” said another Paterson adviser, referring to Mr. Bloomberg’s move this fall in which he marshaled votes on the City Council to nullify a city referendum so that he could run for another term.

In a conference call on Tuesday, Mr. Paterson, who was traveling, declined to address Mr. Silver’s or Mr. Bloomberg’s comments. But he reiterated that he had made no selection and would not do so until Mrs. Clinton was confirmed.

“What I’m trying to keep away from is lobbying, coercion and distracting information,” he said. He added later: “I don’t feel rushed by any of this process. I have said from the very beginning what I thought the right way to do this would be.”

Mr. Silver also praised several other potential appointees to the Senate seat, including Andrew M. Cuomo, the attorney general. Should Mr. Paterson pick Mr. Cuomo, the Legislature would be responsible for choosing his successor, and Mr. Silver would have by far the most influence over that choice.

A spokesman for Mr. Silver declined to say whether the speaker had consulted with Mr. Paterson before speaking publicly about Ms. Kennedy.

Even some of Ms. Kennedy’s potential rivals for the seat expressed some sympathy for her quandary.

“Any true Democrat loves Caroline Kennedy,” said Thomas R. Suozzi, the Nassau County executive, who has said he is also interested in the Senate appointment. “I think the way that her handlers and strategists are pushing her and trying to box in the governor is damaging the reputation of someone that we all care about.”



Home
World U.S. N.Y. / Region Business Technology Science Health Sports Opinion Arts Style Travel Jobs Real Estate Automobiles Back to Top
Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company
Privacy Policy Search Corrections RSS First Look Help Contact Us Work for Us Site Map
 
cAROLINE Kennedy blows off interview with NY Times

Caroline Kennedy finally faced the press; The NY Times that is... This should had been like a Sean Hannity to Sarah Palin interview. However, Ms. Kennedy wasn't able the simple questions asked by the times, YOU KNOW...:rolleyes:....

Amazing! Not even the times think that she's qualify to be a Senator for that state...:D

Caroline Kennedy’s quest to enter the US Senate has suffered a self-inflicted blow in a series of interviews in which she can only be described as . . . um . . . excruciatingly, you know, unerudite.

During a series of meetings with the New York press, one of which was recorded and is now being admired on YouTube in all its ineloquent awkwardness, the daughter of President Kennedy was vague, unconvincing and displayed a potentially ruinous verbal tic.

In one sequence, lasting 2 minutes and 27 seconds, Ms Kennedy, 51, revealed that she had inherited none of the eloquence, energy or charisma associated with other members of America’s foremost political dynasty: she used the phrase “you know” no fewer than 30 times.

Asked to justify her candidacy – after days spent with handlers advising her on how to fill Hillary Clinton’s vacant New York Senate seat – she began in a dull monotone: “Um, this is a fairly unique moment both in our, you know, in our country’s history, and, and in, in, you know, my own life, and um, you know, we are facing, you know, unbelievable challenges, our economy, you know, healthcare, people are losing their jobs here in New York obviously um, arh, you know. . . ”

Related Links
Republicans shamed by 'Barack the Magic Negro'
Clinton camp derides Kennedy's Senate bid
Yesterday The New York Times, which published the interview with Ms Kennedy on Sunday – calling her forceful, but vague and largely undefined – released the full 8,500-word transcript of the encounter, revealing a verbal landscape knee-deep in “you knows”. She used the phrase a grand total of 144 times.

The jeers now pouring into the blogosphere and on to websites demonstrate how unforgiving the modern media, with their new technologies, can be. Just a few years ago Ms Kennedy’s interviews would have appeared only in newspapers, with her verbal tic edited out.

Before the interviews she had faced growing opposition to her candidacy from some prominent New Yorkers, who said she lacked the experience for the job and was acting as if she were entitled to the seat because of her ancestry. Ms Kennedy has led an extremely private life, is a mother of three, a bestselling author, a lawyer and philanthropist – but has no political experience.

It also emerged that she had donated little money to other Democratic candidates in the past and had often failed to vote in elections.

Ms Kennedy wants the New York Governor, David Paterson – who has the sole power to pick a successor to Mrs Clinton now that she is becoming Secretary of State – to appoint her to the seat once held by her uncle, Bobby Kennedy. The weekend interview was aimed at making her case. It has not succeeded.

“The wheels of the bandwagon are coming off,” wrote Michael Goodwin, a veteran columnist with the New York Daily News. “Fantasy is giving way to inevitable truth. The truth is that Kennedy is not ready for the job and doesn’t deserve it. Her quest is becoming a cringe-inducing experience.”

Ms Kennedy’s justification for getting the seat was not a tour de force. “You know, we want to have all kinds of different voices, you know, representing us, and I think what I bring to it is, you know, my experience as a mother, as a women, as a lawyer, you know, I’ve been an education activist for the last six years here, and, you know. . . ”

She is still a strong contender for the seat, but there are half a dozen serious candidates, including Andrew Cuomo, the state attorney-general, who went through a bitter divorce with Ms Kennedy’s cousin, Kerry Kennedy. Ms Kennedy told the Daily News that she had spoken to Mr Cuomo, and added a ringing endorsement: “As I’ve said, he was a friend, a family member, and um so, and uh obviously, he’s, you know, he’s also had an impressive career in public office.”

Talking trash

Gore Vidal His meeting with David Dimbleby on US election night became a YouTube hit. Vidal told Dimbleby he had no idea who his interviewer was, then declared himself too knowledgeable to be interviewed on television

Sarah Palin In September, when the CBS presenter Katie Couric asked John McCain’s running-mate to provide an example of their proposals for reforming the ailing banking industry, she replied: “I’ll try and find some and I’ll bring them to you”

Nancy Dell’Olio Made so little sense while discussing the credit crunch with Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight that he finally told her: “I have no idea what you are talking about”

Tracey Emin Took part in a memorable live debate on Channel 4 in 1997. “I want to be with my friends,” she announced. “I’m drunk. I want to phone my mum. She’s going to be embarrassed by this conversation”

Source: Times archives

Click hear to listen to an excerpt from that inerview: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5416006.ece
 
I saw her in an interview with the NY Times, it was terrible. She said "you know" about 15 times in a 3 minute sound bite. In that sound bite she did not say really much of anything else that really made sense or mattered.

The left went after Sarah Palin for saying "and also" too many times, not one of them I bet will have the package down stairs to do the same to the Democrat princess of Camelot.

Personally I don’t dislike the woman, it does though seem as though she feels entitled to the position. I think she could have been nervous in the various interviews she was in and flopped or they could have been like Palin’s and took the worst 6 minutes of a 2 hour interview. I highly doubt that since the media had it out for Palin and does not for Kennedy. But that could be possible.

The part I find so laughable is the same jerk offs who attacked Palin for basically the same stuff give the dem princess a pass.........so typical
 
I saw her in an interview with the NY Times, it was terrible. She said "you know" about 15 times in a 3 minute sound bite. In that sound bite she did not say really much of anything else that really made sense or mattered.

It was 138 times to be exact, you know....;)
 
Werbung:
It was 138 times to be exact, you know....;)

lol

i liked the part where she said she was in support of the whole nafta problem you know ;)



I know what she meant but it sounded funny the way she said it. I admit im a bit shocked, you would think she would be a better speaker than she is. she has spent years and years talking in front of large groups so its nothing new to her at least i did not think so.

but she could just be nervous like Palin was or its also possible she doesnt even want this but her family wants this for her so she is half hearted about trying for it?
 
Back
Top