WikiLeaks exposes US complicity in murder, torture, by Egyptian government

Stalin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
1,810
This won't even be denied..just ignored

"...On Friday, WikiLeaks released dozens of diplomatic cables that together reveal the US has long been aware of the criminality of the Mubarak regime in Egypt and its savage abuses, including torture, random arrest, and extra-judicial killings. The documents also reveal that plans for the military-supervised transfer of power from Hosni Mubarak to his son, Gamal, were presented to Washington.

The document release, which coincided with mass demonstrations and clashes with police in Cairo, Suez, and other cities, will only serve to further discredit Mubarak, and is a major embarrassment to the Obama administration, whose leading representatives, including President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, have continued to insist that the Mubarak regime is not a dictatorship, while hypocritically calling for “restraint.”

The documents, diplomatic cables from the US embassy in Cairo from 2009 and 2010, make clear that the Obama administration was well aware that the Mubarak regime held onto power by terrorizing the population. But Washington tacitly supported the dictatorship and its crimes because Egypt is considered the most important component to US strategy for a wide region encompassing the Middle East, the Maghreb, and the Horn of Africa.

Perhaps the most damning cable is from Ambassador Margaret Scobey, dated January 15, 2009. The letter calls police brutality “routine and pervasive” and states that “police using force to extract confessions from criminals [is] a daily event.” Embassy informants “estimate there are literally hundreds of torture incidents every day in Cairo police stations alone.”

The rampant abuse of alleged criminals extends to political opponents, the cable notes. One activist, part of what the embassy referred to as “the April 6 Facebook strike,” was arrested on November 20, 2008. “[T]he GOE [government of Egypt] is probably torturing him to scare other ‘April 6’ members into abandoning their political activities,” it adds. The cable also refers to the “sexual molestation of a female ‘April 6 activist.” Scobey reported that another blogger said security forces stopped torturing him only “when he began cooperating.”

more at http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/jan2011/wiki-j29.shtml

Comrade Stalin
 
Werbung:
You're claiming what the cables "make clear", without providing the contents.

Sh__ is all you have, Satlin. :D
 
First you say that I provide too much information ( "huge text dumps")

Then you say not enough.

Then you do your signature - ad hominem abuse.

Are you not capable of finding the cables ?

Comrade Stalin
 
providing the contents.

...sigh...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/series/us-embassy-cables-the-documents

"..Classified By: Ambassador Margaret Scobey for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).

1. (C) Summary and comment: Police brutality in Egypt against common criminals is routine and pervasive. Contacts describe the police using force to extract confessions from criminals as a daily event, resulting from poor training and understaffing. Brutality against Islamist detainees has reportedly decreased overall, but security forces still resort to torturing Muslim Brotherhood activists who are deemed to pose a political threat. Over the past five years, the government has stopped denying that torture exists, and since late 2007 courts have sentenced approximately 15 police officers to prison terms for torture and killings.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/187359

A significant point is that the Wikileaks show that the State Department is doing it's job properly and professionally. The problem is that what they are saying is at odds with what the politicians are saying
 
First you say that I provide too much information ( "huge text dumps")

Text dumps aren't "too much" - they are usually (and in your case) large amounts of text which bounce around the topic at hand or peripheral matters, instead of giving clear support for your assertions. Get it? :rolleyes:

Then you say not enough.

Actually, I said NONE. Can you tell the difference between "not enoughj" and none?? :rolleyes:
 
Werbung:
Can you tell the difference between "not enoughj" and none?

Yes I can

"not enoughj" is the care and attention you apply to your replies

and

"none" is their efficacy and freedom from logical fallacy.

Comrade El Stalino
 
Back
Top