In an alternate, parallel universe, no doubt what you are saying is true. In this one, however, Iraq didn't have WMD, there was no Al Qaeda in Iraq until after the invasion, the masterminds of 9/11 fled to Afganistan and Pakistan, the perpetrators of said attack were killed, and the UN inspectors were in Iraq until we warned them to get out, just before the invasion.
Of course, if you believe in parallel universes, or in the mutability of the past, then what you just posted could well be factual.
=======================
Well, this mythical "left" of which you speak must have read up on their history, or been paying attention. The non left is left to the task of justifying the way the so called "war on terror" has been carried out, which is quite a chore, unless you do believe in the mutability of the past or in parallel universes. I suppose that must explain the fact that the non left seems to be getting smaller and smaller, as long as you define "left" as anyone who thinks that the war was a mistake.
=============================
There is a good reason why Bush didn't have much of a posse when he decided to invade. See above.
=============================
Well, Bush, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, and the other lefties who planned the war told us that Iraqi oil would pay for it. Wrong again!
==============================
OOO, That,s an easy one. There are two reasons why Bush has been criticized by "the left" The first one is that most of who you call "left" are really Democrats, and Bush is a Republican. Whenever one party does something, the other is likely to criticize. It's called party politics.
The other reason is that practically every decision Bush has made in the past seven years has been wrong.
Correct. They said he had "weapons of mass destruction", and was developing nuclear (or nukular, if you prefer) weapons. It is in the resolution to authorize military force passed by the Congress.
Which, of course, means that Congress was wrong also.